1996
DOI: 10.1080/00268979600100541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering lengths for collisions of ground state and metastable state hydrogen atoms

Abstract: Scattering lengths for the collisions of ground and metastable state hydrogen ,1 + EF xy~, e Z u and h3E + molecular potentials are atoms interacting via the B E u, 3 + evaluated from published ab initio Born-Oppenheimer potentials with adiabatic corrections, matched to multipole expansions at large interatomic separations. It is demonstrated that the scattering lengths are very sensitive to the connections between the ab initio potentials and their asymptotic forms and the need is shown for accurate interatom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have used the theoretical value of a 1S−1S = 0.0648 nm [22], which constitutes only a small contribution to χ. The value calculated by Jamieson et al [6], a 1S−2S = −2.3 nm, is in fair agreement with this measurement.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have used the theoretical value of a 1S−1S = 0.0648 nm [22], which constitutes only a small contribution to χ. The value calculated by Jamieson et al [6], a 1S−2S = −2.3 nm, is in fair agreement with this measurement.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…This allows us to deduce the 1S-2S triplet scattering length, which has been calculated by Jamieson, Dalgarno, and Doyle [6]. The frequency shift also provides a probe of the density distribution of our trapped sample, and constitutes a valuable tool for the study of Bose-Einstein condensation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the above derivation of the sum rule assumes coherence of the excitation described by (4). One can see, however, that the results (14), (16), (18) hold as well for an incoherent excitation field of the form A(r)e iωt+iφ(t) with a fluctuating phase φ(t). Also, it is straightforward to generalize the results for the excitation field with different spatial dependence of different frequency components.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atoms are spin polarized and interact in the triplet channel. Calculated values of the 1S−1S and 1S−2S triplet scattering lengths are a 11 = 0.0648 nm [14] and a 12 = −2.3 nm [18]. We neglect 2S − 2S scattering because the excitation rate is assumed low (in the experiment typically 10 −4 of the atoms are excited) so the background gas is essentially pure 1S.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This error is also added to the error budget. According to [13], the interaction cross section for atomic hydrogen in the 2S state is different for triplet and singlet states, and the pressure shift of the 2S hyperfine interval is comparable to the pressure shift of the 2S triplet level. The previous 2S hyperfine interval measurement [2] indicates for a pressure shift of −31(24) MHz/mbar, which is of the same order of magnitude as the pressure shift of the 1S(F = 1, m F = ±1) → 2S(F = 1, m F = ±1) transition in hydrogen which is −8(2) MHz/mbar [11,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%