2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.90.225002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering in the Attractive Yukawa Potential in the Limit of Strong Interaction

Abstract: Scattering in the attractive screened Coulomb (Yukawa) potential in the limit of strong interaction is investigated. It is shown that the scattering occurs mostly with large angles. The corresponding momentum-transfer cross section is calculated. The results are applied to estimate the ion drag force acting on an isolated micron-sized grain in low-pressure bulk plasmas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
187
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
187
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the non-perturbative regime, analytic formulae for σ T have been obtained only within the classical limit (m X v/m φ 1) [21,82,83], given for an attractive potential by…”
Section: Dark Forces and Dark Matter Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the non-perturbative regime, analytic formulae for σ T have been obtained only within the classical limit (m X v/m φ 1) [21,82,83], given for an attractive potential by…”
Section: Dark Forces and Dark Matter Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elastic scattering problem is then analogous to the screened Coulomb scattering in a plasma [29], which is well fit by a cross-section [24,30],…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their preceding Comment, Khrapak et al have raised two objections against the analysis of our experiments: First, the use of the electron Debye length in our comparison with the standard approach of Barnes et al 9 is considered as inadequate and, second, the ion drag model of the same authors 10,11 is favored over the standard approach of Barnes et al In this Response, we will address these two points.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In our analysis 7,8 we have used the electron Debye length, whereas Khrapak et al 10,11 argue that the linearized Debye length would be more appropriate.…”
Section: ϫ2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation