2000
DOI: 10.1117/12.384537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scatter rejection methods in megavoltage imaging with an amorphous-silicon flat-panel array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only difference is that the BIS spectral response function is incorporated into the code. The BIS response, shown in figure 2, is estimated using the MC model detailed in Groh et al (2000). It comprises slabs of copper, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and phosphor having the same dimensions as a detector pixel.…”
Section: Scatter Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only difference is that the BIS spectral response function is incorporated into the code. The BIS response, shown in figure 2, is estimated using the MC model detailed in Groh et al (2000). It comprises slabs of copper, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and phosphor having the same dimensions as a detector pixel.…”
Section: Scatter Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Figure 8 compares the AED obtained with the primary x-ray spectrum ͑dotted͒ with the AED calculated for the scatter spectrum ͑solid͒. Also, for equal primary and scatter fluences, the copper plate/phosphor screen over-responds to scattered photons as compared to water: 31 the probability that an incident x-ray deposits energy in the phosphor layer of the detector was 0.0357 and 0.067 for primary and scattered x rays, respectively. However, since the mean energy of scattered photons is lower, the mean energy deposited per incident scatter x-ray, obtained from the integration of the spectra shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Effect Of Scatter On Portal Image Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%