2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scatter radiation dose at the height of the operator's eye in interventional cardiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted however that moving the C arm would have an impact on the results. 17,33 This study supports further research for glasses use and testing within the clinical setting. Further research is recommended into how changing the C arm angle affects dose rate to the clinician's eye lenses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noted however that moving the C arm would have an impact on the results. 17,33 This study supports further research for glasses use and testing within the clinical setting. Further research is recommended into how changing the C arm angle affects dose rate to the clinician's eye lenses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Further research is recommended into how changing the C arm angle affects dose rate to the clinician's eye lenses. Additionally, the distance between the patient table and operators eyes 20,33 , the size of the irradiated volume 34 along with the exposure parameters 34,35 can affect the dose to the operator and these have remained constant in this study. Future work could also include the testing of lead line smart glasses within an actual interventional procedure, to establish the impact of clinician's gaze.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing complexity of interventional cardiology procedures, however, require longer fluoroscopic duration, leading to increased exposure time to ionizing radiation for the patient, and also for the medical staff since they need to remain close to the patient throughout the procedure. The scattered radiation from the patient and from elements of the X-ray equipment is the main sources of exposure to the medical staff that received via unshielded parts of their bodies [5].…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other European centres have aimed to establish links between eye doses and patient exposure levels (Antic et al 2013, Ciraj-Bjelac et al 2016. Extensive studies of exposure of interventional staff have also been undertaken in the Far East (Yokoyama et al 2017a, 2017b, 2019, Suzuki et al 2018, Kato et al 2019, South America (Leyton et al 2014, Khoury et al 2015 and Australasia (Mclean et al 2016), including comparisons between results from dosemeters worn at the collar and adjacent to the eye (Haga et al 2017). Studies in nuclear medicine have demonstrated that body dosemeters give an indication of eye dose, but there may be some underestimation (Kubo and Mauricio 2014).…”
Section: Q2mentioning
confidence: 99%