2007
DOI: 10.3113/fai.2007.0537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scarf versus Chevron Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus: A Randomized Controlled Trial in 96 Patients

Abstract: No differences of statistical significance could be measured between the two groups with respect to the AOFAS score, HVA, and IMA. Although both groups showed good to excellent results, we favor the chevron osteotomy because the procedure is technically less demanding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
66
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
4
66
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. [2]. This is definitely not always reflected in outcome parameters in literature, due to a lack of uniform and relevant outcome measures in hallux valgus surgery [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. [2]. This is definitely not always reflected in outcome parameters in literature, due to a lack of uniform and relevant outcome measures in hallux valgus surgery [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…One such approach is the SERI (Simple, Effective, Rapid, Inexpensive) osteotomy performed through a small incision under direct visual control that allows for fast and safe correction of the deformity [10]. Although one study reported the outcome of a single surgical procedure for hallux valgus [7], there is only one study between Scarf and a less invasive approach for a distal metatarsal osteotomy [16] and none to our knowledge, with long-term followup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Il en est de même par rapport aux techniques percutanées développées ces dernières années, avec ou sans ostéosyn-thèse [13][14][15][16][17][18] avec des scores fonctionnels postopératoires allant de 82 à 93,5 selon les auteurs [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Une correction angulaire de 50 % est principalement retrouvée dans les études utilisant des techniques d'ostéo-tomies métatarsiennes distales percutanées ou à ciel ouvert [7][8][9]14,18] ou encore avec une ostéotomie de Scarf [6,10,19,21,22]. Une meilleure correction angulaire a été rapportée par Weinberger et al avec une ostéotomie méta-tarsienne percutanée et une diminution de l'angle M1P1 de 26 à 7,5° [29].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified