1875
DOI: 10.1038/012534b0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scarcity of Birds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 points up one defect of the pre‐whitened power spectrum, which is that, surprisingly enough, it does not reproduce the linear power spectrum at the very largest scales (small k ). Indeed, the pre‐whitened power goes negative in the Peacock (1997) case at k ≈0.0023 h Mpc −1 , and in the ΛCDM case at k ≈0.000 21 h Mpc −1 . This turns out to be a generic feature of the pre‐whitened power spectrum if the true power spectrum goes to zero at zero wavenumber, as is true for Harrison–Zel’dovich models, ξ ( k )∝ k as k →0.…”
Section: Pre‐whitened Power Spectrummentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…10 points up one defect of the pre‐whitened power spectrum, which is that, surprisingly enough, it does not reproduce the linear power spectrum at the very largest scales (small k ). Indeed, the pre‐whitened power goes negative in the Peacock (1997) case at k ≈0.0023 h Mpc −1 , and in the ΛCDM case at k ≈0.000 21 h Mpc −1 . This turns out to be a generic feature of the pre‐whitened power spectrum if the true power spectrum goes to zero at zero wavenumber, as is true for Harrison–Zel’dovich models, ξ ( k )∝ k as k →0.…”
Section: Pre‐whitened Power Spectrummentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition to power‐law power spectra, the present paper shows results for the power spectrum derived from observations by Peacock (1997), and for an observationally concordant ΛCDM model from the fitting formulae of Eisenstein & Hu (1998), non‐linearly evolved according to the procedure of Peacock & Dodds (1996). In these cases the adopted amplitudes are those corresponding to n =−1.2, i.e.…”
Section: Problemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations