2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2771084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning tunneling spectroscopy of inhomogeneous electronic structure in monolayer and bilayer graphene on SiC

Abstract: We present a scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) study of the local electronic structure of single and bilayer graphene grown epitaxially on a SiC(0001) surface. Low voltage topographic images reveal fine, atomic-scale carbon networks, whereas higher bias images are dominated by emergent spatially inhomogeneous large-scale structure similar to a carbon-rich reconstruction of SiC(0001). STS spectroscopy shows a ~100meV gap-like feature around zero bias for both monolayer and bilayer graphene/SiC, as well as s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

55
231
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
55
231
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This contradicts our observation of a kink at E D related to electron-plasmon scattering [2], a conclusion supported by doping studies and by theory [3,4]; it also contradicts STM measurements and theory which find no such gap [5,6]. Zhou also asserts that gaps observed in multilayer graphene are dominated by this same substrate effect, and not by the electric field across the film as proposed by Ohta et al [7,8].…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This contradicts our observation of a kink at E D related to electron-plasmon scattering [2], a conclusion supported by doping studies and by theory [3,4]; it also contradicts STM measurements and theory which find no such gap [5,6]. Zhou also asserts that gaps observed in multilayer graphene are dominated by this same substrate effect, and not by the electric field across the film as proposed by Ohta et al [7,8].…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…4) as well as by electron microscopy showing an inhomogeneous distribution of small irregular graphene islands. There may also be defects within the graphene islands: our ideal samples have very few defects visible in STM [5] unlike samples studied by Rutter et al [10], suggesting that such defect formation is sensitive to sample preparation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…3b) due to a vector mismatch: the current in graphene is carried by electron's having non-zero in-plane momentum, , while the distribution of tunneling probabilities through our 1 nm Al 2 O 3 tunneling layer is maximum for = 0 and presents an exponential decay with increasing as shown in STM-tip/graphene measurements. [15][16][17][18][19] This is emphasized in our measurements by the fact that when energies ascribed to out-of-plane acoustic graphene phonon mode at ≈ 60 meV are reached, [15][16][17][18][19] additional inelastic tunneling paths are activated and the current rises. The suppression of the tunneling for small biases and the identification of the phonon-mediated inelastic tunneling channels in the dI/dV spectroscopy further show, in addition to XPS measurements, that the transport occurs as expected in a well-defined Ni/graphene/Al 2 O 3 /Co structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It includes a few intergroup LL anticrossings at large field strengths (B 0 > 100T). The band structures [73,75,78] and the first LL groups [75] have been experimentally verified for bilayer graphene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The band structure and the LLs of monolayer graphene have been verified by a number of experimental methods [59,73,74]. Bilayer graphene, being held together by Van der Waals interactions, can exhibit the highly symmetric AA and AB configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%