1989
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3991(89)90056-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning tunneling and transmission electron microscopy on identical areas of biological specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the lateral and vertical tip forces (37) which can have distorting effects on biological specimens, a number of other tip-surface interactions which produce spatial distortions have been recognized and include the following: tip shape, which acts to broaden convex structures and narrow concave structures (36); tip switching, which produces multiple images (11); tip-absorbed contaminants, which produce false images (16,19,36); capillary condensation of water vapor at ambient pressures, which reduces the height measurement and possibly deforms the surface of the specimen (40); and scanning speed and feedback gain, which may result in electrical interference and structural artifacts (36). Tunneling current in particular is sensitive to the conductive properties of the surface (13,20,27), and consequently, STM height errors from 20 to 70% have been reported (14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the lateral and vertical tip forces (37) which can have distorting effects on biological specimens, a number of other tip-surface interactions which produce spatial distortions have been recognized and include the following: tip shape, which acts to broaden convex structures and narrow concave structures (36); tip switching, which produces multiple images (11); tip-absorbed contaminants, which produce false images (16,19,36); capillary condensation of water vapor at ambient pressures, which reduces the height measurement and possibly deforms the surface of the specimen (40); and scanning speed and feedback gain, which may result in electrical interference and structural artifacts (36). Tunneling current in particular is sensitive to the conductive properties of the surface (13,20,27), and consequently, STM height errors from 20 to 70% have been reported (14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important control for assessing the quality of topographical detail is to utilize structural landmarks or barrier heights for the positive identification of biomacromolecules in scanned images (15,25). Highly ordered biological surfaces (10,16,27,36,37), such as the paracrystalline proteinaceous structures examined in this study, provide mechanically rigid surfaces that contain useful landmark features for assessing image quality. From our TEM characterization of M. hungatei and its envelope structures, we could assess the quality of our STM and AFM images during scanning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first STM featured an integrated Michelson interferometer and an optical microscope designed to ensure accurate x-y calibration and positioning of the sample of interest ( Fig. 6A-C, E and F; Stemmer et al, 1989). Later designs combined the STM with a STEM (Fig.…”
Section: Instrumentation and Methods Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…run in the [112] and [112] directions cutting through the 7x7 corner holes at both top and bottom (111) terraces. TEM and later STM studies show that the [112] steps are more stable than the [112] steps. 119 This is probably related to the effects of the DAS stacking faults.…”
Section: Steps On Semiconductor Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%