2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2012.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning ion conductance microscopy for imaging biological samples in liquid: A comparative study with atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
69
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(60 reference statements)
3
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another problem with AFM is artefacts arising from the mechanical interaction of the tip of the probe and soft cell surfaces, which can be deformed and easily pushed against cortical actin structures [31,36]. SICM is therefore a better choice for soft eukaryotic cells [37,38].…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another problem with AFM is artefacts arising from the mechanical interaction of the tip of the probe and soft cell surfaces, which can be deformed and easily pushed against cortical actin structures [31,36]. SICM is therefore a better choice for soft eukaryotic cells [37,38].…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 Taking into account that greases may contain large amount of lubrication oil, one of the main goals in this study was to establish a reliable method to observe the thickener microstructure of different lubricating greases by preserving the integrity of the samples as much as possible. In particular, since the AFM can work in various environments (vacuum, air and liquid), many researchers have been interested in imaging soft or biological samples [22,23]. Furthermore, recent advances in AFM have enabled highspeed imaging of soft samples allowing the direct visualization of biomolecules [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] However, even in the less intrusive, "non-contact" tapping mode, the AFM cantilever oscillates at amplitudes above the sub-nanometer scale and causes its probe tip to continuously contact the sample, which disturbs soft biological samples. [4][5][6][7] While most SPM techniques were originally designed for imaging nanomaterials in vacuum or air conditions, the scanning ion conductance microscope (SICM), which was invented by Paul Hansma in 1989, 8 is unique because it was designed to probe soft biological systems. In order to do so, the SICM utilizes ion current as the signal in order to measure the topography of soft non-conducting samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%