2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.73.014514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning Hall probe imaging ofErNi2B2C

Abstract: We report scanning Hall probe imaging of ErNi 2 B 2 C in the superconducting, antiferromagnetic, and weakly ferromagnetic regimes in magnetic fields up to 20 Oe, well below H c1 , with two results. First, imaging isolated vortices shows that they spontaneously rearrange on cooling through the antiferromagnetic transition temperature T N = 6 K to pin on twin boundaries, forming a striped pattern. Second, a weak, random magnetic signal appears in the ferromagnetic phase below T WFM = 2.3 K, and no spontaneous vo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On cooling down from just above T N the α a initially increases and then goes into sharp, deep minimum. Such behavior (as opposed to some sort of λ-like anomaly) may be associated with possible formation of the antiferromagnetic domains (twins) in the crystal in zero or small fields [22,23] due to orthorhombic structural distortion below T N [14]. The complexity of in-plane thermal expansion of ErNi 2 B 2 C near T N is illustrated in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On cooling down from just above T N the α a initially increases and then goes into sharp, deep minimum. Such behavior (as opposed to some sort of λ-like anomaly) may be associated with possible formation of the antiferromagnetic domains (twins) in the crystal in zero or small fields [22,23] due to orthorhombic structural distortion below T N [14]. The complexity of in-plane thermal expansion of ErNi 2 B 2 C near T N is illustrated in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates the presence of correlated defects (see e.g. [36,38]). It is possible that these are the twin boundaries one expects because at x=0.26 C T is below the structural phase transition (50 K at x=0.26 [5,9,20]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, low temperatures of superconducting and magnetic phase transitions of known single crystals, as well as the requirement of a high spatial resolution, have limited experimental capabilities for visualization of the magnetic flux structure employing e.g. magnetic force microscopy (MFM), 19 scanning Hall probe imaging, 20 and decoration with magnetic nanoparticles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%