1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0185(199806)251:2<230::aid-ar12>3.0.co;2-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning electron microscopy of denervated taste buds in hamster: Morphology of fungiform taste pores

Abstract: Background: Taste pores of fungiform papillae are critical for taste function. Taste nerve injury affects the pore, rendering it refractory to staining with vital dyes. Whether pores of denervated fungiform papillae disappear or undergo more modest structural changes to account for diminished staining was the subject of the present study.Methods: The chorda tympani in the hamster was severed unilaterally and the anterior tongue prepared for scanning electron microscopy after 31 days of survival.Results: Taste … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy can be attributed to different species and strains of animals and different staining techniques used. For example, mouse strains differ in effects of taste nerve section on taste papillae numbers (St John and Boughter 2004), and the methylene blue staining method employed in our study was shown to have a small false-positive rate (St John et al 1995; Parks and Whitehead 1998). The smaller reduction in percentage of taste buds without taste pores could also be due to incomplete sectioning of the CT, but this is unlikely given that we have observed a clear effect of CTX on taste responses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This discrepancy can be attributed to different species and strains of animals and different staining techniques used. For example, mouse strains differ in effects of taste nerve section on taste papillae numbers (St John and Boughter 2004), and the methylene blue staining method employed in our study was shown to have a small false-positive rate (St John et al 1995; Parks and Whitehead 1998). The smaller reduction in percentage of taste buds without taste pores could also be due to incomplete sectioning of the CT, but this is unlikely given that we have observed a clear effect of CTX on taste responses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Tongues were kept in formalin until the tissue could be processed and the taste pores, taste buds and fungiform papillae counted to confirm transection. Taste pores in fungiform papillae were stained with methylene blue and counted under a light microscope to confirm CTX (see Parks & Whitehead, 1998; Spector, Schwartz, & Grill, 1990) while circumvallate tissue was embedded in paraffin, cut into 5 −10 um sections, mounted and stained using a hemoxylin/eosin procedure to confirm GLX (Guth, 1957; Spector & Grill, 1992). A taste bud was counted in the circumvallate papilla if there was a visible taste pore or a group of well-organized elongated cells very close to the trench, suggesting the apical taste pore was just out of the plane of section (Geran, Garcea, & Spector, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taste pores appeared as small, distinct circular concavities on the surface of the papillae. Previous reports using the dorsal structure of fungiform papillae to quantify pores have indicated that taste pores stained with methylene blue are darker than the surrounding epithelium (Miller and Reedy, 1990;Parks and Whitehead, 1998). Those articles used a different methodology for preparing the tongue and used standard transmitted light microscopy to visualize the tissue.…”
Section: Fungiform Papillae Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our criteria for defining the pore are based on morphological analysis instead of color variation. Using the terminology established in a recent article that examined tongue mor-phology of hamsters (Parks and Whitehead, 1998), a fungiform papilla with a pore was defined as containing three distinct morphological characteristics: a rim that separated the large border of the papilla from the taste pore region, an indentation just inside the rim, and a hillock that protruded slightly from the indentation and contained the pore [see Figs. 1(A,B) and 2(A)].…”
Section: Fungiform Papillae Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%