Cartilage 1983
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-319501-2.50011-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Cartilage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calcified cartilage was occasionally present on the epiphyseal side of growth plates in normal rats [1]. Under hypervitaminosis A, we found that high metachromatic and hypercalcified cartilage areae in the resting cell zone locally extended in the growth plates on the way from the epiphyseal side or throughout the plates longitudinally, but the hypercalcified cartilage contained higher S content than the non-calcified cartilage which was probably eosinophilic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Calcified cartilage was occasionally present on the epiphyseal side of growth plates in normal rats [1]. Under hypervitaminosis A, we found that high metachromatic and hypercalcified cartilage areae in the resting cell zone locally extended in the growth plates on the way from the epiphyseal side or throughout the plates longitudinally, but the hypercalcified cartilage contained higher S content than the non-calcified cartilage which was probably eosinophilic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Mineralisation within rapidly growing growth plate cartilages as well as in other rapid cartilage growth and mineralisation sites is comparable between sites and species and has been reviewed elsewhere (Boyde and Jones, 1983a). The slow creeping mineralisation that occurs in articular cartilage and some fibrocartilage is collagen-based and gives a comparatively smooth front with prominences at sites of pericellular mineralisation Jones and Boyde, 1982).…”
Section: Initial Stages Of Mineralisationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although the tidemark has been described as uncalcified (Stockwell, 1979), this should be taken to mean that it is not fully calcified, as pointed out by Fawns & Landells (1953), who introduced the term tidemark, and is implied by the alternative widely-used term, tidemark mineralizing-front (Boyde & Jones, 1983). This will be referred to again later because it is related to the question of what exactly is left behind on the bone surface when the uncalcified cartilage is destroyed by taphonomic processes or during investigative procedures.…”
Section: Calcified Cartilage As the Bare-bone Surfacementioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to Boyde & Jones (1983), who have done much to explore this layer, no way has been found to separate the two because the bone was originally deposited on the resorbed surface of the calcifying cartilage. According to Gray's Anatomy (Williams, 1995), the interface shows reciprocal fine ridges and grooves which interdigitate and so resist shearing stresses brought about by postural changes and muscle action.…”
Section: Calcified Cartilage As the Bare-bone Surfacementioning
confidence: 97%