2010
DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-2927-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning electron microscopy and molecular dynamics of surfaces of growing and ablating hexagonal ice crystals

Abstract: Abstract. We present the first clearly resolved observations of surfaces of growing and ablating hexagonal ice crystals using variable-pressure scanning electron microscopy. The ice surface develops trans-prismatic strands, separated from one another by distances of 5-10 µm. The strands are present at a wide range of supersaturations, but are most pronounced at temperatures near the frost point. Pyramidal facets consistent with Miller-Bravais indices of 1011, and possibly also 2021, are associated with ice gro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
83
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
14
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10), in agreement with other work (Cross, 1969;Pfalzgraff et al, 2010;Neshyba et al, 2013). The emergence of grooves on sublimating prismatic faces may be due to the presence of stacking faults (Kobayashi and Ohtake, 1974;Kuhs et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10), in agreement with other work (Cross, 1969;Pfalzgraff et al, 2010;Neshyba et al, 2013). The emergence of grooves on sublimating prismatic faces may be due to the presence of stacking faults (Kobayashi and Ohtake, 1974;Kuhs et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We then examine possible causes of the observed roughness. In addition to growth processes we also consider sublimation, since ice surfaces can become rough during rapid sublimation (Cross, 1969;Kobayashi and Ohtake, 1974;Pfalzgraff et al, 2010). This is contrary to what currently appears to be the prevailing view, which postulates that atmospheric ice crystals merely become rounded (Nelson, 1998).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…8). This has been observed regardless of the water model and the crystallographic plane exposed to the vapour phase (Bolton and Pettersson, 2000;Picaud, 2006;Vega et al, 2006;Bishop et al, 2009;Neshyba et al, 2009;Pereyra and Carignano, 2009;Pfalzgraff et al, 2011;Shepherd et al, 2012). The onset temperature of disorder is found to depend on the crystal facet exposed to the vapour phase; for example on the basal plane, the first sign of interfacial disorder occurs about 100 K below the melting point, whereas on the prism plane disorder was observed around T m − 80 K (Conde et al, 2008).…”
Section: Simulations Of Disorder On Pure Icementioning
confidence: 83%
“…The onset temperature of disorder is found to depend on the crystal facet exposed to the vapour phase; for example on the basal plane, the first sign of interfacial disorder occurs about 100 K below the melting point, whereas on the prism plane disorder was observed around T m − 80 K (Conde et al, 2008). The thickness of the disordered interface also shows small differences for different crystal facets (Conde et al, 2008;Pfalzgraff et al, 2011). It appears that the disorder on the basal plane is slightly thicker; a similar trend can also be observed in experiments (Sect.…”
Section: Simulations Of Disorder On Pure Icementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Note, however, that aspect ratio could depend on size (Auer Jr and Veal, 1970;Um et al, 2014). Cloud chamber, in situ, and remote sensing observations indicate that distorted, roughened ice crystals are generally prevalent (Baran, 2009;van Diedenhoven et al, 2013;Pfalzgraff et al, . Simulated Q with respect to view zenith angle for liquid (blue) and ice clouds, including an ice cloud comprised of pristine crystals (green, roughened crystal clouds are shown in red).…”
Section: Observabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%