Scandal and the Work of Art: The Nude in an Aesthetically Inflected Sociology of the Arts

Abstract

. The authors are listed in alphabetical order, having contributed equally to the writing of this paper. For his very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper, we thank Mark Jacobs along with the anonymous reviewers. We particularly wish to acknowledge Vera Zolberg, with whom we discussed this project, for the inspiration she has provided over the years. We dedicate this paper to her memory. 2 Scandal and the Work of Art:The Nude in an Aesthetically Inflected Sociology of the Arts ABSTRACT American sociologists working in the production perspective have produced a rich body of work on systems of aesthetic-cultural production, distribution, and consumption, but they have paid relatively little attention to the work of art. Aligning with new sociological work that takes the work of art seriously, this article contributes to an aesthetically inflected sociology of the arts:research that includes the work of art as an integral part of the analysis. Substantively, we examine a nineteenth-century scandal surrounding paintings of nudes. We show that the work of art constitutes crucial evidence for understanding arts scandals. Artworks are connected with social and aesthetic issues by means of their pictorial elements, which are viewed by a public through historically situated "period eyes." Each of these elements is needed to spark an arts controversy, and all must be studied in order to understand them.

Criticism Of The Digital Functioning Of The Russian Cultural Industry

“…Culture becomes a product of social consumption, adapting to the law of supply and demand. The consumption of culture is also considered as an instrument of self-improvement (Alexander & Bowler, 2018), the quintessence of intellectual (Bermingham, 1995), spiritual and aesthetic development of a person (Klamer, 2016), can be an instrument of social integration of society (Rodner et al, 2020), strengthening of national and collective identity, increasing the general culture in society (Malshina & Bryntsev, 2017). Society expresses itself through cultural consumption.…”

From artistic consecration to degradation: The case of Sven Hassel

“…Status and reputation, as key aspects of human “social cartography” (Fine, 2019: 259), are long-standing sociological topics. This is true also for the sociology of art, which has long sought to dismantle “the romantic view of the artist as isolated genius by showing the inherently collective nature of aesthetic-cultural production” (Alexander and Bowler, 2018: 326). At the same time, scholars sought to “demarcate the sociology of art from adjacent fields” (Born, 2010: 172), especially aesthetics, which emphasizes qualitative properties of artworks and the individual creativity of artists.…”

“…The dominance of social explanation has sometimes prompted sociologists to build upon Bourdieu in the effort to develop approaches that are less “vulnerable to accusations of reductionism for failing to address the specificity of the aesthetic” (Born, 2010: 174) and more “aesthetically inflected” (Alexander and Bowler, 2018). Among the early pioneers of such aesthetically sensitive sociological approach were Griswold (1987) and Zolberg (1990), who insisted, in their own ways, on a “cultural power” or the “capacity of certain works to linger in the mind and…enter the canon” (Griswold, 1987: 1105) shaped by the properties of the work itself.…”

Black Hole Suns: Binarism and Gravity in Cultural Fields

“…These analyses, with their emphasis on meaning in cultural fields, show how aesthetic experience is intimately tied to moral life (Malczewski 2016), outline the ways that artistic legitimation taps into affective and meaningful foundations (McKernan 2018), and demonstrate the ways that metaphorical meaningmaking allows actors to navigate local and global markets (Kharchenkova 2018). And contemporary analyses often aim to bring interpretive methods into conversation with field-theoretical and ecological approaches (Alexander and Bowler 2018). But built as they are on a science of signs, research in this tradition has a tendency to neglect all that does not conform to the patterns of our language (Howes 2005).…”