2005
DOI: 10.1029/2005gl024747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scan asymmetries in AMSU‐B data

Abstract: [1] A simple method of averaging measurements for different scan positions was used to quantify scan asymmetries in AMSU-B brightness temperatures for the sensors on the satellites NOAA 15, 16, and 17. The method works particularly well for the sounding channels 18 to 20. The asymmetries are small in most cases. In particular, asymmetries for Channel 18 are below 1.90, À0.53, and 0.49 K for NOAA 15, 16, and 17, respectively. On the other hand, it was found that the instrument on NOAA 15 has significant asymmet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Far from nadir, channels sounding deep into the troposphere, located on the wings of the 183.31 GHz line, might be more affected by antenna issues than higher peaking channels, located in the center of the line, due to radiation measured by the side lobes. Such asymmetries were found for AMSU-B and MHS (Buehler et al, 2005b;John et al, 2013b), but so far the monitoring of SAPHIR has not shown any scan asymmetry. For ATMS, comparisons of temperature data records (TDRs, calibrated antenna temperatures) and sensor data records (SDRs, BT after further applying beam efficiency and scan-position-dependent bias corrections) for the 183 GHz channels show the same behavior meaning that the TDR to SRD conversion is not responsible for the bias, although it seems to introduce some dependence on the viewing angle that warrants further investigation.…”
Section: Scan Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Far from nadir, channels sounding deep into the troposphere, located on the wings of the 183.31 GHz line, might be more affected by antenna issues than higher peaking channels, located in the center of the line, due to radiation measured by the side lobes. Such asymmetries were found for AMSU-B and MHS (Buehler et al, 2005b;John et al, 2013b), but so far the monitoring of SAPHIR has not shown any scan asymmetry. For ATMS, comparisons of temperature data records (TDRs, calibrated antenna temperatures) and sensor data records (SDRs, BT after further applying beam efficiency and scan-position-dependent bias corrections) for the 183 GHz channels show the same behavior meaning that the TDR to SRD conversion is not responsible for the bias, although it seems to introduce some dependence on the viewing angle that warrants further investigation.…”
Section: Scan Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Consequently, potential non-linear effects as a function of scene brightness temperature are not considered. It has also been shown that there might be scan asymmetry in the AMSU-B brightness temperatures (Buehler et al, 2005;John et al, 2013), which has not been accounted for here.…”
Section: Assumptions and Known Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These instrumental errors can severely degrade the quality of the retrieved IWP if not properly corrected. For example, there was a radio-frequency interference (RFI) problem in CH#3 and CH#4 of AMSU-B (Atkinson, 2001;Buehler et al, 2005), and gain variations/degredations are found in CH#3-CH#5 of AMSU-B on NOAA-16 and NOAA-17 (John et al, 2013). MHS exhibits smaller scandependent biases than AMSU-B, but suspicious behaviors have been reported for CH#3 on NOAA-18 and NOAA-19 and Metop-A (John et al, 2013).…”
Section: Description Of Data Sets and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%