1990
DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199005000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalp Reconstruction by Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[5] The latissimus dorsi muscle can serve as a musculocutaneous or muscular flap in scalp reconstruction, given its large surface area and long vascular pedicle. [6,7] However, it has certain disadvantages that include the requirement of repositioning the patient intraoperatively to harvest the flap, an unnatural appearance of a skin island in the scalp, difficulty in clinical flap monitoring particularly for the muscle-only flaps, a lack of durability in split-thickness grafts, potential complications such as seroma and wound dehiscence in the donor area, and, finally, sacrification of a functional muscle. [8] The serratus anterior flap is another option for scalp reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] The latissimus dorsi muscle can serve as a musculocutaneous or muscular flap in scalp reconstruction, given its large surface area and long vascular pedicle. [6,7] However, it has certain disadvantages that include the requirement of repositioning the patient intraoperatively to harvest the flap, an unnatural appearance of a skin island in the scalp, difficulty in clinical flap monitoring particularly for the muscle-only flaps, a lack of durability in split-thickness grafts, potential complications such as seroma and wound dehiscence in the donor area, and, finally, sacrification of a functional muscle. [8] The serratus anterior flap is another option for scalp reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although their use has longer operative time, more anesthetic exposure, a greater possibility of donor and recipient sites morbidities with bulky non hairy coverage [10-12], they have the best cosmetic and functional outcome [13]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined flaps still do not cover the opposite temporal defect. Probably the only other flap that could be used to reconstruct the entire defect is the omental flap (1,13,14). Had the deficiency of the latissimus in covering the defect been appreciated in patient 1 we would likely have opted for that flap in the first place.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%