2018 ASEE Annual Conference &Amp; Exposition Proceedings
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--30950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling Up or Scale-making? Examining Sociocultural Factors in a New Model for Engineering Mathematics Education

Abstract: Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet's research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the primary intent of the course was to provide scaffolding for success in math and engineering, it was recognized that the course might also provide an environment where a diverse cohort of students could feel part of a supportive community. This sense of community was described previously in student interviews [30], but quantitative assessment results were not previously examined. The premise for the engineering math course was based on the Wright State Model (WSM) [31], with similar learning goals and course content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…While the primary intent of the course was to provide scaffolding for success in math and engineering, it was recognized that the course might also provide an environment where a diverse cohort of students could feel part of a supportive community. This sense of community was described previously in student interviews [30], but quantitative assessment results were not previously examined. The premise for the engineering math course was based on the Wright State Model (WSM) [31], with similar learning goals and course content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In Y1, students felt comfortable inhabiting the dedicated Engineering Math Lab classroom at all hours of the day, as evidenced by end-of-semester feedback and reflection question data. Several students recalled the room as the site of the most memorable moments of the course, particularly when students fell asleep while pulling late night / early morning study sessions (see [10] for more details regarding room use in Y1). There were no other scheduled courses in the Engineering Math Lab during the entirety of the Y1 pilot, as it was a brand-new room completed in time for the start of the semester.…”
Section: Demographic Changes and Use Of Space From Y1 To Y2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Late in the semester he was observed offering help to a peer in the dorms who was further along in the required mathematics sequence and expressed surprise that despite Esteban "only" being in Pre-Calc, he already knew MATLAB. (see [7] for more details on Y1 participant experiences)…”
Section: Background: Local Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engineering Math and the WSM include using MATLAB in the context of guided hands-on laboratory experiences as well as on weekly homework assignments. In Y1, students completed these assignments and labs with minimal complaints and even felt excited to be learning MATLAB earlier than their colleagues in other math classes [7] . This contrasts starkly with Y2, in which students often asked, "why are we learning this if it isn't going to be on the test?"…”
Section: ~ Susan [Pseudonym] Y2 Student Who Dropped the Course In Week 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation