Scaling up integrated primary mental health in six low- and middle-income countries: obstacles, synergies and implications for systems reform

Abstract

Background There is a global drive to improve access to mental healthcare by scaling up integrated mental health into primary healthcare (PHC) systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Aims To investigate systems-level implications of efforts to scale-up integrated mental healthcare into PHC in districts in six LMICs. Method Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 121 managers and service providers. Transcribed interviews were analysed using framework analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and World Health Organization basic building blocks. Results Ensuring that interventions are synergistic with existing health system features and strengthening of the healthcare system building blocks to support integrated chronic care and task-sharing were identified as aiding integration efforts. The latter includes (a) strengthening governance to include technical support for integration efforts as well as multisectoral collaborations; (b) ring-fencing mental health budgets at district level; (c) a critical mass of mental health specialists to support task-sharing; (d) including key mental health indicators in the health information system; (e) psychotropic medication included on free essential drug lists and (f) enabling collaborative and community- oriented PHC-service delivery platforms and continuous quality improvement to aid service delivery challenges in implementation. Conclusions Scaling up integrated mental healthcare in PHC in LMICs is more complex than training general healthcare providers. Leveraging existing health system processes that are synergistic with chronic care services and strengthening healthcare system building blocks to provide a more enabling context for integration are important. Declaration of interest None.

Health system strengthening for mental health in low- and middle-income countries: introduction to the Emerald programme

“…Within Emerald, we have deliberately approached the scaling up of services to identify and treat many more people with mental disorders in LMICs by integrating these activities into mainstream primary and community healthcare services. Paper four in this series 31 is coordinated by Inge Petersen and Fred Kigozi, and discusses the key barriers and facilitators related to such integrated care. 14,[32][33][34][35][36] Mental health information systems 37 and paper six led by Shalini Ahuja 38 sets out our findings of how such indicators can best be implemented.…”

Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries

“…32 A qualitative synthesis using interviews with key stakeholders assessed for barriers in implementing evidence-based mental healthcare into primary healthcare in six LMICs. 40 Findings suggest stigma associated with a mental health diagnosis was a significant barrier in implementation.…”

BJPsych Open fifth anniversary editorial: history, accomplishments, trajectory and passion

“…Further, we published our first thematic series, the eight-paper Emerald Series [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] under the leadership of Professor Sir Graham Thornicroft (BJPsych Open Associate Editor). As described in a prior editorial, 3 annual thematic series are a vision for this journal, and several have been commissioned for the coming years.…”