Objectives
Annually, millions of people in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) receive HIV counselling and testing (HCT), a service designed to inform persons of their HIV status and, if HIV-uninfected, reduce HIV acquisition risk. However, the impact of HCT on HIV acquisition has not been systematically evaluated. We conducted a systematic review to assess this relationship in SSA.
Methods
We searched for articles from sub-Saharan Africa meeting the following criteria: an HIV-uninfected population, HCT as an exposure, longitudinal design, and an HIV acquisition endpoint. Three sets of comparisons were assessed and divided into strata: A) sites receiving HCT versus sites not receiving HCT, B) persons receiving HCT versus persons not receiving HCT, and C) persons receiving couple HCT versus persons receiving individual HCT.
Results
We reviewed 1635 abstracts; eight met all inclusion criteria. Strata A consisted of one cluster randomised trial with a non-significant trend towards HCT being harmful: incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.4. Strata B consisted of five observational studies with non-significant unadjusted IRRs from 0.6 to 1.5. Strata C consisted of two studies. Both displayed trends towards couple HCT being more protective than individual HCT (IRRs: 0.3 to 0.5). All studies had at least one design limitation.
Conclusions
In spite of intensive scale-up of HCT in SSA, few well-designed studies have assessed the prevention impacts of HCT. The limited body of evidence suggests that individual HCT does not have a consistent impact on HIV acquisition, and couple HCT is more protective than individual HCT.