Scaling-up health information systems to improve HIV treatment: An assessment of initial patient monitoring systems in Mozambique

Abstract

Introduction The rapid scale-up of HIV care and treatment in resource-limited countries requires concurrent, rapid development of health information systems to support quality service delivery. Mozambique, a country with an 11.5% prevalence of HIV, has developed nation-wide patient monitoring systems (PMS) with standardized reporting tools, utilized by all HIV treatment providers in paper or electronic form. Evaluation of the initial implementation of PMS can inform and strengthen future development as the country moves towards a harmonized, sustainable health information system. Objective This assessment was conducted in order to 1) characterize data collection and reporting processes and PMS resources available and 2) provide evidence-based recommendations for harmonization and sustainability of PMS. Methods This baseline assessment of PMS was conducted with eight non-governmental organizations that supported the Ministry of Health to provide 90% of HIV care and treatment in Mozambique. The study team conducted structured and semi-structured surveys at 18 health facilities located in all 11 provinces. Seventy-nine staff were interviewed. Deductive a priori analytic categories guided analysis. Results Health facilities have implemented paper and electronic monitoring systems with varying success. Where in use, robust electronic PMS facilitate facility-level reporting of required indicators; improve ability to identify patients lost to follow-up; and support facility and patient management. Challenges to implementation of monitoring systems include a lack of national guidelines and norms for patient level HIS, variable system implementation and functionality, and limited human and infrastructure resources to maximize system functionality and information use. Conclusions This initial assessment supports the need for national guidelines to harmonize, expand, and strengthen HIV-related health information systems. Recommendations may benefit other countries with similar epidemiologic and resource-constrained environments seeking to improve PMS implementation.

Electronic Health Information Systems to Improve Disease Diagnosis and Management at Point-of-Care in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Narrative Review

“…Evidence on EHIS in developing countries revealed the following eHealth attributes: tracking of patients who were initiated on treatment; monitoring of adherence to care and early detection of potential loss to follow up; minimize the time it takes to communicate data between different levels; reduction of errors especially the laboratory data; linkage to bar code for unique identification and laboratory samples and the prescription of medication [18]. In Mozambique, a robust electronic patient management system facilitated a facility-level reporting of required indicators, improved ability to identify patients lost to follow-up; and support facility and patient management for HIV care [19]. An implementation study aimed at implementing an integrated pharmaceutical management information system for antiretroviral treatment (ART) and other medicines in Namibia showed the system's reliability in managing ART patients, monitoring ART adherence and HIV drug resistance early warning indicators [20].…”

Expansion of Viral Load Testing and the Potential Impact on Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drug Resistance

“…Countries like South Africa and Mozambique have demonstrated the utility in both developing data systems and triangulating data from multiple sources to perform meaningful data analyses [29, 31]. Other studies have demonstrated the potential of mathematical models and algorithms applied to EMRs to optimize patient management [32].…”

Ethical issues in the use of SMS messaging in HIV care and treatment in low- and middle-income countries: case examples from Mozambique

“…Technical support for health information systems, from which SMS messaging systems have evolved, has relied on international NGOs, which initially implemented their chosen systems with few common standards and very little harmonization. 29 This approach often fosters an environment in which control of the system lies outside of local structures, leading to duplication and fragmentation of efforts, in turn creating interoperability challenges. 2 , 20 , 29 Furthermore, donor support is often short-term, making sustainability difficult once the project ends.…”

“… 29 This approach often fosters an environment in which control of the system lies outside of local structures, leading to duplication and fragmentation of efforts, in turn creating interoperability challenges. 2 , 20 , 29 Furthermore, donor support is often short-term, making sustainability difficult once the project ends. Dependence on short-term funding may be one of the reasons why many mHealth initiatives do not move beyond the pilot phase into wider adoption.…”