2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-013-0749-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling Transition in Earthquake Sources: A Possible Link Between Seismic and Laboratory Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is low relative to some other eastern North America events, and even many shallow‐induced events [e.g., Block et al , ] and shallow hydraulic events [e.g., Goertz‐Allmann et al ., ]. However, it is well within the large range of values for normal tectonic earthquakes [e.g., Cotton et al , ; Malagnini et al , ]. For the 2011 Prague main shock the 1 MPa apparent stress value is qualitatively similar to the results of Sun and Hartzell [], who obtained an overall stress drop of 1.6 MPa.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This value is low relative to some other eastern North America events, and even many shallow‐induced events [e.g., Block et al , ] and shallow hydraulic events [e.g., Goertz‐Allmann et al ., ]. However, it is well within the large range of values for normal tectonic earthquakes [e.g., Cotton et al , ; Malagnini et al , ]. For the 2011 Prague main shock the 1 MPa apparent stress value is qualitatively similar to the results of Sun and Hartzell [], who obtained an overall stress drop of 1.6 MPa.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, this is not the case because we have carefully obtained source spectra by correcting for propagation effects. Malagnini et al [] suggests that the non‐self‐similar stress drop scaling, derived assuming an omega‐squared model like the present case, may be explained by the self‐similar scaling under the assumption of a non‐omega‐square fall‐off model. Although we cannot rule out this possibility based on the present data set alone, we favor the omega‐squared model because it satisfactorily explains the observed spectral ratios satisfactorily (Figure S8) and is also supported by a number of microearthquake observations [e.g., Abercrombie , ; Ide et al , ; Imanishi and Ellsworth , ].…”
Section: Source Spectra and Source Parameterssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Shearer et al 2006;Allmann & Shearer 2007;Oth et al 2010), yet studies on single seismic sequences often provide indications that smaller events have lower stress drops than larger ones (e.g. Mayeda & Malagnini 2010;Mereu et al 2013;Malagnini et al 2014). For the Colfiorito (1997Colfiorito ( -1998 and L'Aquila (2009) seismic sequences, Malagnini et al (2008Malagnini et al ( , 2011 found a clear departure from self-similarity, given by stress drops around 22 MPa for the largest events (M w 6.0) and around 5 MP for smaller magnitudes (e.g.…”
Section: Source Scaling Of the L'aquila Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%