2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.245205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling theory for percolative charge transport in molecular semiconductors: Correlated versus uncorrelated energetic disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The c dependence is the same as for the EGDM, in accordance with the conclusion in Ref. [11] that the c dependence at not too high c only depends on the shape of the DOS.…”
Section: Mobility Functionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The c dependence is the same as for the EGDM, in accordance with the conclusion in Ref. [11] that the c dependence at not too high c only depends on the shape of the DOS.…”
Section: Mobility Functionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Another important difference is that the ECDM predicts a much stronger F dependence than the EGDM. The c dependence of both models was shown to be essentially the same [11]. Good agreement between measured T -dependent current density-voltage (J -V ) characteristics of hole-only devices of α-NPD [N,N -Di(1-naphthyl)-N,N -diphenyl-(1, 1 -biphenyl)-4,4 -diamine] and those calculated with both the EGDM and ECDM could be obtained, but with different values of σ and N t : σ = 0.14 eV, N t = 0.20 × 10 27 m −3 for the EGDM and σ = 0.10 eV, N t = 3.7 × 10 27 m −3 for the ECDM [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Cottaar et al showed that a 1/ T 2 dependence is also expected for transport in a Gaussian DOS when reorganization plays a role. The C coefficient is a function of the ratio between the reorganization energy and σ , and its measurement may thus be used to determine the relative role of reorganization 10, 11. Time‐of‐flight (TOF) mobility measurements 12 and analyses of the current–voltage ( J ( V )) characteristics of unipolar sandwich‐type single layer devices yield indeed often a 1/ T 2 temperature dependence 12, although also a 1/ T dependence has been obtained from such studies 13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Формаль-но, энергетическую зависимость r(E) нетрудно учесть (см. далее уравнение (10)), однако анализ возможного вида такой зависимости для других моделей темпов переходов (например, модели Маркуса [17,18]), а также анализ применимости концепции транспортного уровня в этом случае (фактически, эта концепция применена в работе [18]) выходят за рамки данной работы. Следующее приближение находим, учитывая произ-водную по времени в уравнении (2) в нулевом при-ближении.…”
Section: вр никитенко аю кудровunclassified