‘Scaling’ the academia: Perspectives of academics on the impact of their practices

Abstract

The pressure on the universities to take a visible place in the rankings has caused anachronistic policies and practices in evaluating the performance of universities. The value attributed to the rankings results in policies prioritizing the criteria imposed by rankings while evaluating the performance of academics, which successively causes several issues in assessing the real impact of the academic practices. Considering these criticisms and concerns about the impact assessment, this study aimed at exploring the perceptions of academics about the impact of their academic practices. Adapting the interpretive phenomenological design, the data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 participants from the field of education in five flagship universities of Turkey. The findings of the study revealed that, although impact assessment understanding of the academics and their institutions go parallel with covering the practices around three basic missions of the university, many activities go in between without recognition by the same impact assessment practices. Interestingly, the academics exhibited their commitment to institutional policies in impact assessment practices; however, they exhibit resentment for the same policies due to failing to recognize the localized mission of the university, threatening the deeply rooted values of the academy, fouling the academy with ethical violations, and causing further detachment between academic practices and societal needs. The concerns and criticism of the current impact assessment are likely to alter the priorities of the universities and push them to adapt an impact assessment, which is less relevant to the local needs of their societies.

Cross Analysis on Social Justice Leadership of School Principals in Turkey and Greece

“…As in Greek Constitution, Turkish Constitution mentions about social justice. However, while school principals' responsibilities, duties and powers are described clearly and in detail to ensure the fulfillment of the administrative duties of principals in regulations, they do not have a concrete job definition for social justice (Gündüz & Balyer, 2013;Kondakçı et al, 2016). It is possible to find many direct or indirect articles related to distributive, recognizing and participatory dimensions of social justice in the laws, regulations, development plans regulating the education system, including the constitution.…”

A Review on the Working Conditions and Occupational Health and Safety Issues of International Students in Turkey

“…Reasons for international students to work most international students in Turkey are employed in workplaces. Results from the related literature suggest that the main reasons for international students to work are to earn money, cover living expenses, and elevate their standard of living (Kondakci et al, 2023;Yilmazel & Atay, 2023). However, some students have expressed a desire to gain work experience to improve their Turkish and understand Turkish culture.…”

Normative isomorphism: The patterns of profession of academics at Turkish higher education

“…In addition to that, the decreasing availability of public financial resources and triggering movement for internationalization have forced Turkish universities take part in global rankings. Thus, academics have started to adopt strategies to improve the quality of the publication, and research (Kondakci, Zayim-Kurtay, Kaya-Kasikci, Senay, & Kulakoglu, 2021). According to Scimago Journal & Country Rank (2021), Turkish scholars published 650,228 articles between 1996 and 2020, and received 11.85 citations per paper on average.…”