2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling relations of cluster elliptical galaxies atz~ 1.3

Abstract: Context. We studied the size-surface brightness and the size-mass relations of a sample of 16 cluster elliptical galaxies in the mass range ∼1010 −2 × 10 11 M , which were morphologically selected in the cluster RDCS J0848+4453 at z = 1.27. Aims. Our aim is to assess whether they have completed their mass growth at their redshift or significant mass, and/or size growth can or must still take place until z = 0. This will enable us to know whether the elliptical galaxies of clusters follow or not the observed si… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
9
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The brightest and more massive cluster spheroids in this sample seem to have already arrived at their final configuration by the beginning of this period (cf., Saracco et al 2014) but fainter galaxies are likely to show significant evolution, analogous to the observations by Huertas-Company et al (2015) in the CANDELS field. However, most of our discussion as to the former must be qualitative for now, as there are too few bright galaxies in the small number of high redshift clusters that we observe to draw statistically valid conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The brightest and more massive cluster spheroids in this sample seem to have already arrived at their final configuration by the beginning of this period (cf., Saracco et al 2014) but fainter galaxies are likely to show significant evolution, analogous to the observations by Huertas-Company et al (2015) in the CANDELS field. However, most of our discussion as to the former must be qualitative for now, as there are too few bright galaxies in the small number of high redshift clusters that we observe to draw statistically valid conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…(e.g. Saracco et al 2014;Trujillo et al 2014;Ferré-Mateu et al 2012;van der Wel et al 2012;Buitrago et al 2013). In this context, very interestingly, the mean value of the β parameter we have derived for our dense high-z ETGs is 7.0±1.7, and perfectly agrees with the mean value of massive ATLAS 3D dense ETGs, 7.5 ± 1.7.…”
Section: D-dynamical Models (K) Assupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Once considered the morphological and size caveats discussed in the previous sections, our results are consistent with the literature results, but constraining more tightly the size evolution, or differ for understood reasons detailed below. For example, Saracco et al (2014) find consistent mass-size relation comparing Coma and a z = 1.26 cluster, similarly to the more constraining work of Andreon et al (2014) that has an enlarged redshift baseline. Both works lack sensitivity, being based on a handful of galaxies at high redshift, and indeed the more stringent upper limit derived in Andreon et al (2015) is fully consistent with the change we measure in the present work.…”
Section: Appendix C: Morphological Classificationsupporting
confidence: 62%