2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.87.052809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling range of power laws that originate from fluctuation analysis

Abstract: We extend our previous study of scaling range properties performed for detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) [Physica A 392, 2384 (2013)] to other techniques of fluctuation analysis (FA). The new technique, called modified detrended moving average analysis (MDMA), is introduced, and its scaling range properties are examined and compared with those of detrended moving average analysis (DMA) and DFA. It is shown that contrary to DFA, DMA and MDMA techniques exhibit power law dependence of the scaling range with r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detrended covariance f 2 DCCA (s, j) is obtained for each box j of length s and it is further averaged over all boxes of length s to get F 2 DCCA (s) as an estimated covariance for scale s. For the power-law cross-correlated processes, we have F 2 DCCA (s) ∝ s 2Hxy . There are various ways of treating overlapping and non-overlapping boxes for scales s as the method can become computationally highly demanding [35,36,[60][61][62]. Due to this fact, we use non-overlapping boxes with a minimum scale of 10, a maximum scale of T /5 and a step between s equal to 10 in the simulations.…”
Section: Time Domain Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detrended covariance f 2 DCCA (s, j) is obtained for each box j of length s and it is further averaged over all boxes of length s to get F 2 DCCA (s) as an estimated covariance for scale s. For the power-law cross-correlated processes, we have F 2 DCCA (s) ∝ s 2Hxy . There are various ways of treating overlapping and non-overlapping boxes for scales s as the method can become computationally highly demanding [35,36,[60][61][62]. Due to this fact, we use non-overlapping boxes with a minimum scale of 10, a maximum scale of T /5 and a step between s equal to 10 in the simulations.…”
Section: Time Domain Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5]). Many works have been dedicated to its empirical characterization [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], reporting strong evidence of its presence in financial markets. Several models have been proposed [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] to reproduce these empirical facts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive numerical simulations display that the performance of the DMA approach is comparable to the DFA approach with slightly different priorities under different situations [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. In real applications, one should keep it in mind that the determination of scaling ranges plays a crucial role in computing the scaling exponents [31][32][33]. These methods have been extended to many directions, such as objects in high dimensions [34][35][36][37][38], detrended cross-correlation analysis and its variants for two time analysis [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52], detrended partial cross-correlation analysis for multivariate time series [53][54][55], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%