2013
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling of xylem and phloem transport capacity and resource usage with tree size

Abstract: Xylem and phloem need to maintain steady transport rates of water and carbohydrates to match the exchange rates of these compounds at the leaves. A major proportion of the carbon and nitrogen assimilated by a tree is allocated to the construction and maintenance of the xylem and phloem long distance transport tissues. This proportion can be expected to increase with increasing tree size due to the growing transport distances between the assimilating tissues, i.e., leaves and fine roots, at the expense of their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(98 reference statements)
4
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Little is known, and much of the studies contradict one another about the variation in phloem conduit properties and flow conducting area with changing tree size and axial position . Studies have found that the phloem pressure gradient is constant (Windt et al 2006;De Schepper et al 2013a;Hölttä et al 2013), but may also increase with tree height (Mencuccini and Hölttä 2010;Dannoura et al 2011). The latter result contradicts Turgeon (2010), who suggested that phloem turgor pressure differences does not scale to tree size.…”
Section: Current Research Trends In Forest Sciencescontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Little is known, and much of the studies contradict one another about the variation in phloem conduit properties and flow conducting area with changing tree size and axial position . Studies have found that the phloem pressure gradient is constant (Windt et al 2006;De Schepper et al 2013a;Hölttä et al 2013), but may also increase with tree height (Mencuccini and Hölttä 2010;Dannoura et al 2011). The latter result contradicts Turgeon (2010), who suggested that phloem turgor pressure differences does not scale to tree size.…”
Section: Current Research Trends In Forest Sciencescontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Here, the capacity to remobilize carbohydrates from storage may play a critical role [139] further supporting the notion that, ultimately, the functionality of water transport in xylem is coupled with carbohydrate transport in phloem [9,40]. In theory, this link is well described [38,140], yet in practice we lack studies that combine in-situ measurements of pressure and concentration gradients driving radial transport of water and carbohydrates.…”
Section: Integrated Whole-tree Hydraulic Functioningmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Larger hosts are predominantly older individuals with larger external surface areas and accrue greater parasite intensities through time and space (see Poulin and Morand, 2000;Poulin, 2013). Tree size is strongly correlated with tree age (Bond, 2000), whilst phloem thickness strongly scales with tree diameter (Amman, 1969;Speights and Conway, 2010;Hölttä et al, 2013;Davis and Hofstetter, 2014). Phloem translocates nutritionally-rich photosynthates from the canopy to the roots (Högberg et al, 2001;Zwieniecki et al, 2004;Pompon et al, 2011) and is the sole foodstuff for A. virescens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Beneath tree outer bark, phloem carries photosynthates from the canopy to the roots (Högberg et al, 2001;Zwieniecki et al, 2004;Pompon et al, 2011). Phloem thickness scales strongly with tree diameter (Amman, 1969;Speights and Conway, 2010;Hölttä et al, 2013;Davis and Hofstetter, 2014), is a nutrient-rich resource (Pompon et al, 2011), and the sole foodstuff of A. virescens. Conversely, the hydrostatic conductance of phloem is reduced in older, larger trees, indicating a decreased flow of photosynthates (Yoder et al, 1994;Bond, 2000;Hölttä et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation