2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.214506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling of the physical properties in Ba(Fe,Ni)2As2single crystals: Evidence for quantum fluctuations

Abstract: We report on local magnetization, tunnel diode oscillators, and specific-heat measurements in a series of Ba(Ni x Fe 1−x ) 2 As 2 single crystals (0.26 x 0.74). We show that the London penetration depth λ(T ) = λ(0) + λ(T ) scales as λ (0) in both underdoped and overdoped samples. Moreover, the slope of the upper critical field [H c2 = −(dH c2 /dT ) |T →Tc ] decreases with T c in overdoped samples but increases with decreasing T c in underdoped samples. The remarkable variation of λ(0) with T c and the nonexpo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our calculations, we considered a gap value of ∆ = 2.6 k B T c , which is consistent with experimental data for pnictides [24]. However, Rodière et al [31] estimated the paramagnetic limit H p (0) based on the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory (∆ = 1.86 k B T c ) and if we use the same approach, we get H p (0) = 39.7 T (Ba(Fe 0.95 Ni 0.05 ) 2 As 2 ) and H p (0) = 20.08 T (Ba(Fe 0.92 Ni 0.08 ) 2 As 2 ), which is in good agreement with the values for single crystals. Furthermore, some inconsistency between the results is mainly associated with the lower T c in single crystals compared to the obtained films, and with the structural inhomogeneities of the latter.…”
Section: Electronic Structure Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In our calculations, we considered a gap value of ∆ = 2.6 k B T c , which is consistent with experimental data for pnictides [24]. However, Rodière et al [31] estimated the paramagnetic limit H p (0) based on the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory (∆ = 1.86 k B T c ) and if we use the same approach, we get H p (0) = 39.7 T (Ba(Fe 0.95 Ni 0.05 ) 2 As 2 ) and H p (0) = 20.08 T (Ba(Fe 0.92 Ni 0.08 ) 2 As 2 ), which is in good agreement with the values for single crystals. Furthermore, some inconsistency between the results is mainly associated with the lower T c in single crystals compared to the obtained films, and with the structural inhomogeneities of the latter.…”
Section: Electronic Structure Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…When the field increased above B p , the local magnetization sensor started to read increasing voltage as the number of vortices grew. The local magnetization measurements were performed at various temperatures for several different positions of the sensor with respect to the sample edge, as described more in detail by Rodière et al [30] The temperature dependence of B c1 measured at two different sensor positions is displayed in the inset of figure 2…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the field increased above B p , the local magnetization sensor started to read increasing voltage as the number of vortices grew. The local magnetization measurements were performed at various temperatures for several different positions of the sensor with respect to the sample edge, as described more in detail by Rodière et al [30] The temperature dependence of B c1 measured at two different sensor positions is displayed in the inset of Figure 2 permitted us to gain the effective Ginzburg -Landau parameter  = 13.5 ± 1 along with the effective penetration depth  =  = 345 ± 30 nm, much larger than  0 . The value of  is in accordance with the expected type II superconductivity in SrPd 2 Ge 2 and in steep contrast to  0 = 0.11 estimated from the penetration depth  0 and the coherence length  0 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the temperature dependence of the first vortex penetration field has been experimentally obtained by measuring the onset of the trapped flux moment M t as described in Refs. [52,53]. In contrast to tracking, the virgin M(H ) curves at low fields at several temperatures where a heavy data postprocessing is needed now a careful measurement protocol needs to be followed with little data analysis.…”
Section: And the Energy Of The Quasiparticles Is Given Bymentioning
confidence: 99%