Extensive calculations using density functional theory enable us to explain the origin of the surprising room-temperature conversion of anatase to rutile phase of TiO 2 when doped with Co and Ni, but not with Cu. Contrary to earlier suggestion, neither high spin nor strain of the transition metals is found to be responsible for this phase conversion. The driving mechanism, instead, is attributed to the increased interaction between Co and Ni atoms forming a linear chain in the rutile phase. We predict that Cr and Mn which have even larger spins than Co and Ni cannot induce this phase conversion.Growing interest in the study of TiO 2 semiconductor stems from its current use in photovoltaics, 1 electrochromics, 2 sensors, 3 and photocatalysis. 4 In the ground state TiO 2 exists in the anatase phase and undergoes transition to the rutile phase at temperatures well in excess of 600°C. 5 Since the optical and electrical properties of anatase and rutile TiO 2 are distinctly different, it is desirable to be able to control phase content and conversion between these two phases. In particular, it has been suggested that, due to the novel semiconducting properties of the anatase/ rutile interface region, partial conversion from anatase to rutile phase may render TiO 2 with exciting photocatalytic properties. 6-8 Consequently, there has been considerable interest 9-11 in finding ways to induce this phase transition at lower temperatures. In a recent paper, Gole et al. 12 reported the surprising room-temperature phase conversion of anatase to rutile TiO 2 by using transition-metal ions with highly unpaired electron spins. They showed that Co, and to a lesser extent Ni, accomplishes this conversion, while it does not occur when Cu is used as a dopant. The authors attributed the origin of this phase conversion to the magnetic nature of Co and Ni.In this Rapid Communication we show that Ni in TiO 2 is nonmagnetic and Co doping continues to enable the phase conversion even after switching off the magnetic interaction. Furthermore, Cr and Mn whose atomic spins are larger than that of Co are also incapable of causing this phase transition. The origin of the phase conversion resulting from Co and Ni doping is found to be due to the increased interaction between these atoms as they form a linear chain in the rutile structure. Our studies also reveal some unusual magnetic behavior of Cu, Fe, and Cr when doped in TiO 2 : nonmagnetic Cu couples ferromagnetically, ferromagnetic ͑FM͒ Fe couples antiferromagnetically, and antiferromagnetic ͑AFM͒ Cr couples ferromagnetically.The relaxations in the lattice caused by the dopant atom͑s͒, the total energy, and the electronic structure were calculated using Vienna ab initio simulation package ͑VASP͒ ͑Ref. 13͒ and the projector augmented wave ͑PAW͒ ͑Ref. 14͒ method. The PAW generalized gradient approximation ͑GGA͒ ͑Ref. 15͒ potentials with the valence states 3d and 4s for Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu and 2s and 2p for O were used. High precision calculations with a cutoff energy of 400 eV for ...