2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling of fault attributes: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
191
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
13
191
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular fault (3), displaying a synsedimentary activity during the deposition of both the Rotzo and the Monte Zugna formations, has a cumulative offset of 160 m, whereas fault (2) induces thickness variations only in the Rotzo formation with a dip-slip displacement of 120. According to the displacement-length scaling relationships for normal faults [Kim and Sanderson, 2005;Torabi and Berg, 2011], this value suggest a length of these extensional faults in the order of the tens of kilometers at the time of its Mesozoic activity. Although slightly reactivated during the Alpine deformation, the attitudes and kinematics of the faults still preserve the traces of their ancient activity and are consistent with an E-W regional extension associated with the Early Jurassic rifting in the area [Bertotti, 2001].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular fault (3), displaying a synsedimentary activity during the deposition of both the Rotzo and the Monte Zugna formations, has a cumulative offset of 160 m, whereas fault (2) induces thickness variations only in the Rotzo formation with a dip-slip displacement of 120. According to the displacement-length scaling relationships for normal faults [Kim and Sanderson, 2005;Torabi and Berg, 2011], this value suggest a length of these extensional faults in the order of the tens of kilometers at the time of its Mesozoic activity. Although slightly reactivated during the Alpine deformation, the attitudes and kinematics of the faults still preserve the traces of their ancient activity and are consistent with an E-W regional extension associated with the Early Jurassic rifting in the area [Bertotti, 2001].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length and the height of the fault can be deduced from fault picks and constrained by published scaling laws between fault length and maximum displacement (e.g., Nicol et al, 1996;Torabi and Berg, 2011). Choosing the width of the fault operator is more subjective.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Childs et al (2009) noticed the lack of scaling laws integrating the width of the zone of normal drag adjacent to a fault. This width can probably be related to the width of the brittle damage zone and thus to the maximum displacement using previously published scaling laws (e.g., Torabi and Berg, 2011;Johri et al, 2014;Choi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Schematic view of the geometric parameters involved in a fracture network, including: (i) fracture length, (ii) aperture, (iii) surface roughness, (iv) dead-end, (v) number of intersections, (vi) hydraulic gradient, (vii) boundary stress, (viii) anisotropy, and (ix) scale 1989). Actually, in natural fractured rock masses, the fracture length has very broad distributions and is observed to follow the power-law, exponential, and lognormal types of functions (Chelidze and Gueguen 1990;Chang and Yortsos 1990;Sahimi 1993;Watanabe and Takahashi 1995a, b;Andrade et al 2009;Torabi and Berg 2011;Torabi 2012, 2013). Among them, the power law distribution has been most widely utilized (Segall and Pollard 1983;Gudmundsson 1987;Childs et al 1990;Sornette et al 1993;Davy 1993;Bour and Davy 1997;Bogdanov et al 2007;Reeves et al 2013), with a typical form of…”
Section: Permeability and Fracture-length Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%