2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2795630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling of asymmetric magnetic reconnection: General theory and collisional simulations

Abstract: A Sweet-Parker-type scaling analysis for asymmetric antiparallel reconnection (in which the reconnecting magnetic field strengths and plasma densities are different on opposite sides of the dissipation region) is performed. Scaling laws for the reconnection rate, outflow speed, the density of the outflow, and the structure of the dissipation region are derived from first principles. These results are independent of the dissipation mechanism. It is shown that a generic feature of asymmetric reconnection is that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

94
708
3
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(808 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
94
708
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For full generality, we first perform the analysis on asymmetric reconnection and then take the symmetric limit for application to this study. Our analysis is similar to previous Sweet-Parker analyses of asymmetric reconnection 4,7 . Figure 1 shows a schematic of the energy fluxes into and out of the diffusion region.…”
Section: Theorysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For full generality, we first perform the analysis on asymmetric reconnection and then take the symmetric limit for application to this study. Our analysis is similar to previous Sweet-Parker analyses of asymmetric reconnection 4,7 . Figure 1 shows a schematic of the energy fluxes into and out of the diffusion region.…”
Section: Theorysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…͑17͔͒. This result has been used in a series of subsequent publications [1][2][3] and the same result has also been obtained in a similar way in a paper by different authors at about the same time. 4 If we repeat their analysis based on Eqs.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…We assume incompressible plasma flow and anti-parallel magneticflux tubes of equal field strength |B x |. The situation could be generalized to allow for compressible plasma and asymmetric field strengths (Cassak & Shay 2007), flux tubes intersecting at an angle or with a shared component of magnetic field (guide field) B z (Linton et al 2001), twisted flux tubes with magnetic helicity (Zweibel & Rhoads 1995), etc. All of these are relevant for applications, but we keep the setup simple in order to make the new ideas clear.…”
Section: Large-scale Magnetic Reconnectionmentioning
confidence: 99%