2012
DOI: 10.1364/jocn.4.000a17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling Low-Latency Optical Packet Switches to a Thousand Ports

Abstract: Optical packet switches that scale to thousands of input/output ports might find their application in nextgeneration datacenters (DCs). They will allow interconnecting the servers of a DC in a flat topology, providing higher bandwidth and lower latency in comparison with currently applied electronic switches. Using a simple analytic model that allows computing end-to-end latency and throughput, we show that optical interconnects that employ a centralized (electronic) controller cannot scale to thousands of por… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figures clearly indicate that the performances worsen increasing the port-count. This behavior is due to the fact that the contention probability increases increasing the port-count as explained in [11]. Simulation results indicate a packet loss lower than 10 −6 with an average latency around 900 ns, and 100% throughput is assured for input traffic up to 0.3 regardless the switch portcount.…”
Section: Numerical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The figures clearly indicate that the performances worsen increasing the port-count. This behavior is due to the fact that the contention probability increases increasing the port-count as explained in [11]. Simulation results indicate a packet loss lower than 10 −6 with an average latency around 900 ns, and 100% throughput is assured for input traffic up to 0.3 regardless the switch portcount.…”
Section: Numerical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This makes the overall switch configuration time almost independent of the number of ports. As we have already shown in [11], in order to have low configuration time and thus low extra-latency added to the system the employment of a distributed control is necessary. Scaling an OPS based on rearrangeable non-blocking architectures, like Beneš or Banyan, to a large number of ports would require long configuration times due to the need of a centralized controller.…”
Section: Wdm Modular Ops Architecture With Highly Distributed Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An appropriate scheduling algorithm along with edge electronic buffers enables a contention-free optical burst switching core network. The idea of building large-scale optical burst switches with edge electronic buffers has been the motivation of various research efforts [83][84][85][86].…”
Section: Optical Burst Switching With Edge Electronic Buffersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is investigated for a link with flow-control. In [11][12][13], this phenomena is investigated using a variety of analytical and numerical approaches. In brief, it is used that an optical link with a switching system as in Fig Using the approaches, we were able to compute the latency and throughput of the switch as a function of the number of ports (Fig.…”
Section: Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, only the switch was replaced. It is visible that sub-microsecond latency at high system loads is achievable [11]. The switch architecture is as in Fig.…”
Section: Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%