2013
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.21441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling Limits of Additive Functionals of Interacting Particle Systems

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Using the renormalization method introduced in [17], we prove what we call the local Boltzmann-Gibbs principle for conservative, stationary interacting particle systems in dimension d = 1. As applications of this result, we obtain various scaling limits of additive functionals of particle systems, like the occupation time of a given site or extensive additive fields of the dynamics. As a by-product of these results, we also construct a novel process, related to the stationary solution of the stochast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19], [14], [28], and [26] and references therein for statements and more discussion). When p is mean-zero and f is a degree 1 function (such as the occupation function f (η) = η(0) − ρ), in d = 1, a functional CLT in anomalous scale has been proved [10]. Otherwise, characterizing the fluctuations of Γ f (t) is open.…”
Section: Finite-range Models: Asymmetric Transitions and Kpz Exponentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19], [14], [28], and [26] and references therein for statements and more discussion). When p is mean-zero and f is a degree 1 function (such as the occupation function f (η) = η(0) − ρ), in d = 1, a functional CLT in anomalous scale has been proved [10]. Otherwise, characterizing the fluctuations of Γ f (t) is open.…”
Section: Finite-range Models: Asymmetric Transitions and Kpz Exponentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these models, one should be able to repeat our multi-scale argument for higher degree polynomial functions, as done in [12]. These are works in progress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first statement is a consequence of the Energy Estimate (2.15); the proof of Theorem 2.1 in [16] can be readily adapted to our situation. Starting from (5.2), the proof of Theorem 2.5 in [16] can be adapted to prove the convergence stated in the second statement. The third statement is a consequence of this convergence combined with Theorem 2.14 in [3].…”
Section: Discussion and Remarksmentioning
confidence: 85%