2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling Law of Quasi Brittle Fragmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2020) found that the fragment size distribution defined two power‐law trends (two slopes, or D ‐values, in a log‐log plot) that intersect at a value of s = ∼10 μm (Figure 4). Such “bifractal” distributions are observed in a wide range of different processes from drilling, brecciation, crushing, and milling of rock (Barnett, 2004; Carpinteri & Pugno, 2002; Farris & Paterson, 2007; Roy et al., 2012; Taşdemir, 2009) to rapid shock fragmentation of brick, glass, quartz, rock and ceramic (Barnett, 2004; Capaccioni et al., 1986; Davydova et al., 2014; Fujiwara et al., 1977; Hossain & Kruhl, 2015; Keulen et al., 2007; Roy et al., 2012; Suteanu et al., 2000). Bifractal distributions are sometimes interpreted as identifying a grinding limit (e.g., Keulen et al., 2007), but 10 μm is far too large for the grinding limit of garnet (∼0.26 μm for almandine‐pyrope; B. R. Song, Johnson, Song, et al., 2020).…”
Section: Calculation Of Fragment Size For Surface Energy and Strain R...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2020) found that the fragment size distribution defined two power‐law trends (two slopes, or D ‐values, in a log‐log plot) that intersect at a value of s = ∼10 μm (Figure 4). Such “bifractal” distributions are observed in a wide range of different processes from drilling, brecciation, crushing, and milling of rock (Barnett, 2004; Carpinteri & Pugno, 2002; Farris & Paterson, 2007; Roy et al., 2012; Taşdemir, 2009) to rapid shock fragmentation of brick, glass, quartz, rock and ceramic (Barnett, 2004; Capaccioni et al., 1986; Davydova et al., 2014; Fujiwara et al., 1977; Hossain & Kruhl, 2015; Keulen et al., 2007; Roy et al., 2012; Suteanu et al., 2000). Bifractal distributions are sometimes interpreted as identifying a grinding limit (e.g., Keulen et al., 2007), but 10 μm is far too large for the grinding limit of garnet (∼0.26 μm for almandine‐pyrope; B. R. Song, Johnson, Song, et al., 2020).…”
Section: Calculation Of Fragment Size For Surface Energy and Strain R...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the data for zirconia ceramics Fig. 6 presents the values of power law exponent obtained from a series of fragmentation experiments with different materials: quartz bars under impact loads (rhombi) [3], silicon carbide-based ceramics SiC (filled circles) subjected to a split Hopkinson pressure bar test, and Syminal (synthetic mineral alloy) specimens (open circles) under high-speed impact loading [4]. The analysis of dependencies plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its chief distinction is the long-range defect interaction, which provides energy dissipation typical of critical behavior in non-equilibrium systems. Taking into account the peculiarities of quasi-brittle fracture the experimental techniques based on in-situ study (time series of pulses of acoustic emission or fractoluminesence [1]) of static and dynamic fracture have been proposed [2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e have analyzed fragmentation of six materials under five different loading conditions: i) granite fragmentation under quasi-static loading (present paper); ii) fragmentation of impact-loaded quartz bars [18][19][20]…”
Section: Comparison With Other Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZrO [20][21][22][23] and SiC [21] ceramics fragmentation in a Hopkinson pressure bar test, iiii) syminal (synthetic mineral alloy) fragmentation under high-speed impact [20]; iiiii) fragmentation of tubular alumina ( 2 3 Al O ) samples under shock-wave loading [24,25]. The main parameter, which governs fragmentation statistics, is the specific strain energy ( J/kg) E .…”
Section: Comparison With Other Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%