1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(98)00219-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling in the safety of next generation reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tab. 3 reports an excerpt of a summary table provided in [23]. Although reported scaling factors show significant differences between the facilities and the prototype, the authors conclude that "the same important processes occurred in the ITF as might be expected in the AP-600", since "the magnitude of the non-dimensional coefficients were similar for the ITFs and the AP-600.…”
Section: Scaling Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tab. 3 reports an excerpt of a summary table provided in [23]. Although reported scaling factors show significant differences between the facilities and the prototype, the authors conclude that "the same important processes occurred in the ITF as might be expected in the AP-600", since "the magnitude of the non-dimensional coefficients were similar for the ITFs and the AP-600.…”
Section: Scaling Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the conservation equations are combined with constitutive equations (equations of state and thermodynamic relations) to build the model that governs the significant processes, e.g. a pressure rate equation [34]. The model can be normalized and the coefficients of the non-dimensional equations are expressed in terms of πmonomial groups, Ξx,y, which indicate the relative importance of a parameter y in the changes of a parameter x.…”
Section: Global System Scaling Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“… La interpretación más habitual para estas diferencias es que los parámetros adimensionales son similares entre la instalación experimental y el prototipo y, por tanto, se reproduce la misma fenomenología en ambos casos. Otras interpretaciones podrían ser: 1) las diferencias entre la instalación experimental y el prototipo son grandes y no existe un intervalo de valores que justifique la aceptación o el rechazo de las diferencias y 2) los factores adimensionales son irrelevantes durante el transitorio si se reproduce la misma fenomenología en la instalación experimental y el prototipo (Banerjee et al, 1998).…”
Section: Trabajos Más Recientesunclassified