1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4371(97)00316-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling in currency exchange

Abstract: We study the scaling behavior in currency exchange rates. Our results suggest that they satisfy scaling with an exponent close to 0.5, but that it differs qualitatively from that of a simple random walk. Indeed price variations cannot be considered as independent variables and subtle correlations are present. Furthermore, we introduce a novel statistical analysis for economic data which makes the physical properties of a signal more evident and eliminates the systematic effects of time periodicity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
75
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
75
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the assumption of daily repetition of the stochastic process, we implement a corresponding analysis of fluctuations throughout a trading week (8). Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the assumption of daily repetition of the stochastic process, we implement a corresponding analysis of fluctuations throughout a trading week (8). Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…West et al [1997], Barabási and Albert [1999], Newman [2005]). In finance, there is one scaling law that has been widely reported (Müller et al [1990], Mantegna and Stanley [1995], Galluccio et al [1997], Guillaume et al [1997], Ballocchi et al [1999], , Corsi et al [2001], Di Matteo et al [2005]): the size of the average absolute price change (return) is scale-invariant to the time interval of its occurrence. This scaling law has been applied to risk management and volatility modelling (see Ghashghaie et al [1996], Gabaix et al [2003], Sornette [2000], Di Matteo [2007]) even though there has been no consensus amongst researchers for why the scaling law exists (e.g., Bouchaud [2001], Barndorff-Nielsen and Prause [2001], Farmer and Lillo [2004], Lux [2006], Joulin et al [2008]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at the scaling law characterizing physical systems where large numbers of units interact [4][5][6][7], anyway, one observes that there is no need to introduce different classes of agents. Since the details of the circumstances governing the expectations and decisions of all the individuals are unknown to the modeler, the behavior of a large number of heterogeneous agents may best be formalized using a probabilistic setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%