2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling forces to asteroid surfaces: The role of cohesion

Abstract: The scaling of physical forces to the extremely low ambient gravitational acceleration regimes found on the surfaces of small asteroids is performed. Resulting from this, it is found that van der Waals cohesive forces between regolith grains on asteroid surfaces should be a dominant force and compete with particle weights and be greater, in general, than electrostatic and solar radiation pressure forces. Based on this scaling, we interpret previous experiments performed on cohesive powders in the terrestrial e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
262
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
11
262
0
Order By: Relevance
“…xc, xc, sr, lr (21) where f is again some (in general different) range-separating function, and we replaced the screened dipole potential in the long-range part with the bare dipole potential, since it is assumed that the range of the exchange-correlation kernel is shorter than that of the range-separating function f. This separation splits the n-th term in the Dyson equation into 2 n terms, each of which is formed by some particular combination of T sr and T lr . Now we contract all the short-range segments ...α 0 T sr α 0 ... contained in these terms and introduce an effective short-range screened polarizability α sr (r, r′) such that the Dyson equation becomes Here, only the long-range coupling is considered explicitly via T lr , whereas the short-range coupling enters implicitly in the effective short-range screened polarizability α sr .…”
Section: Exact Correlation Energy From the Nonlocal Dynamic Polarizabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…xc, xc, sr, lr (21) where f is again some (in general different) range-separating function, and we replaced the screened dipole potential in the long-range part with the bare dipole potential, since it is assumed that the range of the exchange-correlation kernel is shorter than that of the range-separating function f. This separation splits the n-th term in the Dyson equation into 2 n terms, each of which is formed by some particular combination of T sr and T lr . Now we contract all the short-range segments ...α 0 T sr α 0 ... contained in these terms and introduce an effective short-range screened polarizability α sr (r, r′) such that the Dyson equation becomes Here, only the long-range coupling is considered explicitly via T lr , whereas the short-range coupling enters implicitly in the effective short-range screened polarizability α sr .…”
Section: Exact Correlation Energy From the Nonlocal Dynamic Polarizabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spinning-up selection process leaves behind the relatively fine-grained regolith with low thermal inertia that we see today 5 , and would work in addition to the thermal fatigue mechanism of asteroid regolith formation 22 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where g A is the ambient gravity and d is the grain diameter 5 . To prevent loss of surface material requires bond numbers of at least one, but surface stability requires the bond numbers to be greater than ten, which places limits on the possible grain sizes present.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We plan to consider this possibility in more detail in a forthcoming paper. -The fractured material remains at the surface, possibly owing to either molecular sticking (Scheeres et al 2010) or an insufficiently interconnected system of fractures. This process leads to a gradual growth of the fractured volume near the surface, the physical and mechanical properties of which may be different from those of the core (interestingly, recent laboratory experiments have demonstrated that the thermal fatigue is able to disintegrate the surface of NEAs, producing a low-conductivity regolith layer, Delbo et al 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we assume that the surface layer consists of particulate material, we neglect the effects of mechanical stresses in this part of the body. Two extreme approaches can then be adopted: (i) the surface layer is never removed from the body, assuming that the electrostatic and molecular sticking of its particles is able to resist either centrifugal or tidal effects (e.g., Scheeres et al 2010), and it only increases in size; or (ii) the surface layer, or its part, could be removed under some conditions by centrifugal or tidal accelerations. We deal with the first case and the second one is postponed to a forthcoming paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%