2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(99)00310-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling factors for production rates of in situ produced cosmogenic nuclides: a critical reevaluation

Abstract: New scaling factors are presented describing the altitude and latitudinal dependence of production rates for in situ produced cosmogenic nuclides. The new factors incorporate the influence of the non-dipole contributions to the geomagnetic field on the cosmic ray flux. The currently used scaling factors of Lal [Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 104 (1991) 424^439] are based on the assumption of a dipole field. The overall strategy used in deriving the new scaling factors is, however, very similar to that of Lal and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
233
0
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(139 reference statements)
6
233
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…We exclude the 4 sample locations underlain by granite from this part of the analysis in order to avoid a bias based on lithology, as the granitic samples consistently have lower denudation rates than the samples from the gneissic lithologies. The landform with the lowest hillslope gradients are the ridges at 24º, which also have the lowest average denudation rates with 30-64 mm ky reported by Heimsath et al (1997;2000; at the saprolite-bedrock boundary for similar lithologies in the western USA and Australia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We exclude the 4 sample locations underlain by granite from this part of the analysis in order to avoid a bias based on lithology, as the granitic samples consistently have lower denudation rates than the samples from the gneissic lithologies. The landform with the lowest hillslope gradients are the ridges at 24º, which also have the lowest average denudation rates with 30-64 mm ky reported by Heimsath et al (1997;2000; at the saprolite-bedrock boundary for similar lithologies in the western USA and Australia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Scaling followed the latitude and altitude scaling laws of Dunai (2000). Corrections for geomagnetic field variations were not made.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This calculator returns the production rate correction factor based on the systematics of both Lal (1991) and Dunai (2000). The more recent Dunai correction factor is used to calculate the surface production rate P 0 , based on a high latitude, sea level production rate of 5.55 atoms 10 Be per gram of quartz per year (Perg et al, 2001).…”
Section: Hancock Pers Comm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production rates are dependent on local characteristics of the geomagnetic field, and so must be scaled for use at a particular altitude and geographic latitude (Lal, 1991;Dunai, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the surface, the first variable, energy, tends to decrease with distance from the Equator due to interactions with Earth's magnetic field, and is well modelled with a series of scaling laws (Lal, 1991;Dunai, 2000;Granger and Muzikar, 2001). The second factor, angle of incidence, has a large influence on the resulting production rate (Dunne et al, 1999), but is less easily quantified owing to skyline shielding.…”
Section: Applications Of In Situ Produced Cosmogenic Nuclidesmentioning
confidence: 99%