2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.vlsi.2017.02.002
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling equations for the accurate prediction of CMOS device performance from 180 nm to 7 nm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
133
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stillmaker et al presented in Ref. [4] scaling equations for all CMOS technologies starting from 180 nm down to 7 nm. They did extensive spice simulations and produced equations to calculate the delay of any node based on the delay of the previous node using their scaling equation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stillmaker et al presented in Ref. [4] scaling equations for all CMOS technologies starting from 180 nm down to 7 nm. They did extensive spice simulations and produced equations to calculate the delay of any node based on the delay of the previous node using their scaling equation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other traditional gains, such as increasing the switching speed and lowering the supply voltage to improve power consumption, are no longer sustainable. [1][2][3][4] Beyond 32 nm, the conventional planar CMOS transistors also suffered from high variability and performance degradation. 5 During the process of attempting to improve transistor performance, the double-gated transistors showed good potential towards improving the switching strength and hence the performance of the transistor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to have a fair comparison, the operational frequency can be normalized by the CMOS technology. The delay information for the 180 nm, 130 nm, and 90 nm [16], which are 77.2 ps, 34.7 ps, and 26.5 ps for an inverter delay, is used to normalize the frequency. Thus, the definition of the frequency normalized function is expressed as follows.…”
Section: Comparison To Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freq n = Freq w × Delay w Delay 90 nm (16) where the Freq n indicates the operational frequency normalized to 90 nm technology, and Freq w is the operational frequency that want to be normalized. The Delay 90 nm and Delay w are the inverter delay time for the 90 nm and the technology which want to be normalized, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison To Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table I gives the comparison between other recent works and the proposed architectures at the 32-bit counters option. In the table, to make a fair comparison, the F Max results of [13] and [14], which were respectively built on a 65 nm FPGA and a 40 nm FPGA, were scaled into equivalent 20 nm chips' performances by using the scaling equations from work [15]. After that, their MIPS results were also scaled proportionally according to their scaled F Max values.…”
Section: Fic Core Modulementioning
confidence: 99%