2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling effects between micro- and macro-tribology for a Ti–MoS2 coating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies on such MoS 2 þTi coatings showed that their friction behaviours under air and dry N 2 are extremely good [20,22,23,30,31]. Such a coating has been recommended for use in vacuum [16], though one study concluded against it [22].…”
Section: Mos 2 þ Timentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies on such MoS 2 þTi coatings showed that their friction behaviours under air and dry N 2 are extremely good [20,22,23,30,31]. Such a coating has been recommended for use in vacuum [16], though one study concluded against it [22].…”
Section: Mos 2 þ Timentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that no one has yet precisely explained the mechanisms involved in those friction behaviours, either good or bad [16,32]. However, recent studies on MoS 2 þTi coating behaviour under air at different humidity levels [31,33] showed that, provided that the Ti content is lower than 20%, a high humidity level leads to higher friction and more debris than at low humidity level. Simmonds [20] also reported that high wear occurred in the early stages of MoS 2 þ Ti friction under air 50% HR.…”
Section: Mos 2 þ Timentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When steady-state conditions are reached, the coefficient of friction is lower when roughness (Ra) is low by friction between the surfaces, so the correlation between roughness parameters and tribological behaviour is strong. However average roughness is the dominant on tribological behaviour properties of contact surfaces, under dry conditions [13] . Figure 4 shows the hardness vs. roughness (Ra) for A 6092, A5056 and A 3003 alloys under dry sliding conditions.…”
Section: Wear Rate and Friction Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, microtopography, contact between two moving surfaces is an important basis for the development of basic concepts [13] . Many studies have been conducted mainly in the lubricant friction morphology Al alloys with the effect of friction and wear resistance of these alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%