2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-020-01013-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling earthquake magnitude in real time with high-rate GNSS peak ground displacement from variometric approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EEW is currently being carried out on a global scale [9,21,33]. PGD and PGV from high-rate GNSS data provide a way to quickly estimate the earthquake magnitude [16,32], as shown during the Maduo earthquake in this study. Although this method does not require complex fault rupture models, there are some issues that need attention and resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EEW is currently being carried out on a global scale [9,21,33]. PGD and PGV from high-rate GNSS data provide a way to quickly estimate the earthquake magnitude [16,32], as shown during the Maduo earthquake in this study. Although this method does not require complex fault rupture models, there are some issues that need attention and resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PGD and PGV are critical parameters during EEW; they can provide rapid magnitude estimation before rupture end [30][31][32], thereby issuing reliable warning information to the public. During the Maduo earthquake, because the majority of high-rate GNSS stations were far from the epicenter and unevenly distributed, we discuss how the number of high-rate GNSS stations might influence the stability and convergence time of magnitude estimation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on high-rate GNSS displacements, Crowell et al [22] built the empirical relationship between magnitude and peak ground displacement (PGD) and retrieved the unsaturated magnitude. The effectiveness of this empirical relationship has been verified in many earthquakes [23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Beyond that, some researchers studied methods of real-time centroid moment tensor inversion, static fault slip distribution inversion, and dynamic rupture process inversion with high-rate GNSS displacements [30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Tesolin et al conducted a zero-displacement experiment to examine the contribution of Galileo observations at a 1 Hz sampling rate to the VA technique, and they stated that GPS + Galileo observations are better than single-system solutions [16]. Zang et al employed GPS, GLONASS, and BeiDou observations at a 1 Hz sampling rate to evaluate the ability of the VA method in earthquake magnitude estimation, and they reported that multi-GNSS observations provide more reliable displacement compared to a single system [17]. Finally, Bezcioglu et al conducted a series of shaking table experiments to investigate the performance of the VA technique based on single-frequency (SF) GPS and GPS + Galileo observations at a 20 Hz sampling rate in a possible SHM/EEW systems, and they concluded that the GPS + Galileo combination provides more accurate displacement compared to GPS-only solutions [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%