2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.81.100507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling behavior of the critical current in clean epitaxialBa(Fe1xCox)

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
94
4
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
12
94
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…other 122-type films [7,26,28,29] in similar ranges of H and T. The BaFe 2 As 2 :P epitaxial film obtained in this study exhibited a lower anisotropy than those of BaFe 2 As 2 :P [7] and BaFe 2 As 2 :Co/Fe buffer. [29] Moreover, the anisotropy obtained is much lower than that of the SL thin films, [28] and is comparable to that of the BaFe 2 As 2 :P films with artificial pinning centers created by BaZrO 3 nanoparticles. [26] As discussed above, the strong vortex pinning and the isotropic J c properties were achieved by decreasing the growth rate for the BaFe 2 As 2 :P epitaxial films.…”
Section: Junction Devicesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…other 122-type films [7,26,28,29] in similar ranges of H and T. The BaFe 2 As 2 :P epitaxial film obtained in this study exhibited a lower anisotropy than those of BaFe 2 As 2 :P [7] and BaFe 2 As 2 :Co/Fe buffer. [29] Moreover, the anisotropy obtained is much lower than that of the SL thin films, [28] and is comparable to that of the BaFe 2 As 2 :P films with artificial pinning centers created by BaZrO 3 nanoparticles. [26] As discussed above, the strong vortex pinning and the isotropic J c properties were achieved by decreasing the growth rate for the BaFe 2 As 2 :P epitaxial films.…”
Section: Junction Devicesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…3(a). [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Moreover, at 9 T, J c H//c is 0.8 MA/cm 2 and the pinning force is 72 GN/m 3 .…”
Section: Junction Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30 In contrast, at high pulse energy, the DR was too high to complete the surface reconstruction, leading to the increased FWHMs with increasing pulse energy, completing the inverted bell-like shape of the FWHM. Iida et al 28,29 also reported epitaxial growth of Ba(Fe,Co) 2 As 2 films using a KrF excimer laser, but they need to use a Fe buffer layer to obtain good epitaxial films. This would be because that their laser power was in the range of 3-5 J/cm 2 , which is much lower than our optimum values (see Table I), and their substrate-to-target distance was longer (50 mm) than that of our PLD growth chamber (30 mm); therefore, we speculate that the above-discussed supersaturation regime is not attained due to the low density and the low kinetic energies of the deposition precursors, and consequently the Fe buffer layer is required to assist improved epitaxial growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, by introducing the bcc-Fe buffer layer with thickness of ∼15 nm, the obtained values of T c for Co-doped Ba122 films on LSAT and MgO substrates increased by ∼2-4 K compared to those of films on bare these substrates. Additionally, the observed self-field J c in the Co-doped Ba122 films on the Fe buffer layer was 0.45 MA/cm 2 at 12 K, which was several times higher than that of the film on the bare LSAT substrate [57]. On the other hand, Katase et al demonstrated that the Co-doped Ba122 films with high T c and J c could be grown without any buffer layers only by the optimization of the PLD deposition condition [58].…”
Section: -Systemmentioning
confidence: 95%