1984
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.30.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling and final-state interactions in deep-inelastic neutron scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
266
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
5
266
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 On the contrary in this paper we have shown ͑see Sec. IV͒ that the contribution coming from the 1/q 2 term, although small, in general can not be negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 On the contrary in this paper we have shown ͑see Sec. IV͒ that the contribution coming from the 1/q 2 term, although small, in general can not be negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…In particular an important question is the size and functional form of these deviations occurring at finite q. Various procedures have been proposed in the literature, [25][26][27][28] in order to cope with these deviations, for instance, Sears 26 suggested removing the antisymmetric part of these contributions by simply symmetrizing the data about yϭ0. However, a model-independent framework for a description of DINS in molecular systems is still needed which is also able to cope with the scattering process at finite q.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the scattering data is presented and analyzed in terms of the West scaling variable Y and the neutron Compton profile J(Y, Q) 54 . These quantities are defined as follows:…”
Section: Impulse Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider below a method which has extensively been applied in the past 30 before the rediscovery of the 1/q GRS expansion of the response ͑4a͒. 15 Recently it has been brought to the fore again in an attempt to parametrize data without the intervention of a theory.…”
Section: Cumulant Expansions Of the Responsementioning
confidence: 99%