“…E.g., given Q n , choosing G to be the trivial group gives Newtonian particle mechanics with its notion of absolute space, while choosing G to be the Euclidean group of translations and rotations gives instead a relational Leibnizian particle mechanics, such as in Barbour and Bertotti's works. The choice of G as the similarity group, which includes dilatations alongside the translations and rotations, has also been investigated (Barbour, 2003). For Q = Riem(Σ), one could again choose G to be the identity, which amounts to the coordinate grids painted on Σ having physical significance, while the persistent relationalist might choose G to be the diffeomorphisms on Σ to ensure that this is not the case (Wheeler, 1968, Barbour & Bertotti, 1982, Barbour, 1994a.…”