Abstract-We used the electroencephalogram (EEG) to investigate whether positive and negative performance feedbacks exert different long-lasting modulations of electrical activity in a reasoning task. Nine college students serially tested hypotheses concerning a hidden rule by judging its presence or absence in triplets of digits, and revised them on the basis of an exogenous performance feedback. The scaling properties of the transition period between feedback and triplet presentation were investigated with detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). DFA showed temporal scale-free dynamics of EEG activity in both feedback conditions for time scales larger than 150 ms. Furthermore, DFA revealed that negative feedback elicits significantly higher scaling exponents than positive feedback. This effect covers a wide network comprising parietooccipital and left frontal regions. We thus showed that specific task demands can modify the temporal scale-free dynamics of the ongoing brain activity. Putative neural correlates of these long-lasting feedback-specific modulations are proposed. When confronted with problems that they must solve under incomplete information, people typically generate and select hypotheses, and modify them according to feedback from the environment. Positive feedback should help in keeping the current hypothesis active and in keeping competing hypotheses in the foreground.Negative feedback is instrumental in shutting down neural activity associated to invalidated hypotheses, inhibiting hypothesis-feedback associations, and in promoting new hypothesis testing (HT) (Papo et al., 2003).The modalities through which performance feedback modulates subsequent activity are still poorly understood. Studies of the time course of brain electrical activity timelocked to performance feedback using event-related potentials (ERPs) showed that positive and negative feedback conditions were associated with topographically and chronometrically separable patterns of electrical brain activity (Papo et al., 2003;Miltner et al., 1997;Ruchsow et al., 2002;Muller et al., 2005). Moreover, neuroimaging studies of performance feedback (Elliott et al., 1997;Monchi et al., 2001) showed that positive and negative feedback specifically activates separable fronto-limbico-striatal loops. Altogether, the regulatory properties of feedback were proposed to be fulfilled by a reward-related dopaminergic corticostriatal circuit (Holroyd and Coles, 2002) and its stress-driven resetting by medial temporal brain structures (Papo et al., 2003).Both ERP and neuroimaging studies concentrated on the short-run (Ͻ1 s) time-locked impulse-like effects of feedback. The underlying assumption was that this time window represents the characteristic temporal scale of the response to feedback. However, contrary to perceptual phenomena, the length and content of reasoning episodes are not strictly determined by the discrete events or stimuli promoting them. In fact, reasoning comes in episodes of uneven length. This variability is inherent to the phenomenon....