2003
DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0503-60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale-Free Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
1,126
1
48

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,886 publications
(1,193 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
18
1,126
1
48
Order By: Relevance
“…We were able to generate graphs with scaling factor within 1.5 ≤ α ≤ 4.9. This is not a problem, because researchers claim that for most real networks α falls approximately between 2 and 3 [41], [42]. Thus, we show the results for this range, without loss of generality.…”
Section: Random Walk Vs ρ-Geodesic Between-nessmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We were able to generate graphs with scaling factor within 1.5 ≤ α ≤ 4.9. This is not a problem, because researchers claim that for most real networks α falls approximately between 2 and 3 [41], [42]. Thus, we show the results for this range, without loss of generality.…”
Section: Random Walk Vs ρ-Geodesic Between-nessmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We investigate the impact of this difference on the importance of nodes in synthetic random networks with power law degree distribution (P ∝ degree(υ i ) −α ), generated by the Havel-Hakimi [39], [40] algorithm. We chose the power law distribution because it is the most common in real networks [41]. We were able to generate graphs with scaling factor within 1.5 ≤ α ≤ 4.9.…”
Section: Random Walk Vs ρ-Geodesic Between-nessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They separately modeled networks with nearest neighbor, random, and scale free small--world organization. In scale--free networks, the number of connections from a node is distributed not in a Gaussian fashion but according to a power law so that most nodes have few connections but a few have a very large number (Barabási & Bonabeau, 2003). Within each organizational scheme they varied whether a select group of cells or a random group received inputs from light.…”
Section: Integrating Intracellular Operations Into An Intercellular Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between the structure of (a) random network and (b) scale-free network. In the scale-free network, the hubs are highlighted with black nodes verified to be the scale-free network [8][9][10], whose degree distribution follows a power law, i.e.,P (κ) ∼ κ −γ , where P (κ) is the probability that a randomly selected node has κ connections, and γ is the power of the degree distribution [18][19][20]. The comparison between the structure of the random network and the structure of the scale-free network is given in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%