2006
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia

Abstract: The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia is a reliable and valid measure of ataxia, making it an appropriate primary outcome measure for clinical trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
1,284
7
22

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,538 publications
(1,335 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
22
1,284
7
22
Order By: Relevance
“…SARA has 1 underlying construct that explains 80% of the variation with 8 separate criteria, all scored on ordinal scales (gait, stance, sitting, speech disturbance, finger chase, nose‐finger test, fast alternating hand movements, and heel‐shin slide). SARA has high inter‐rater reliability ICC (0.98) and a test–retest reliability ICC of 0.90 39. The equine modified ataxia scale in this study performed comparably to subscales of the ICARS, but poorly in comparison with the overall excellent agreement and reliability of SARA 39.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SARA has 1 underlying construct that explains 80% of the variation with 8 separate criteria, all scored on ordinal scales (gait, stance, sitting, speech disturbance, finger chase, nose‐finger test, fast alternating hand movements, and heel‐shin slide). SARA has high inter‐rater reliability ICC (0.98) and a test–retest reliability ICC of 0.90 39. The equine modified ataxia scale in this study performed comparably to subscales of the ICARS, but poorly in comparison with the overall excellent agreement and reliability of SARA 39.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…SARA has high inter‐rater reliability ICC (0.98) and a test–retest reliability ICC of 0.90 39. The equine modified ataxia scale in this study performed comparably to subscales of the ICARS, but poorly in comparison with the overall excellent agreement and reliability of SARA 39. However, only neurologists or senior neurology residents assessed the patients in the SARA work and it was conducted on greater numbers of subjects, meaning that a direct comparison with this study might be misleading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 17 patients, four could not tolerate one of either baclofen or chlorzoxazone due to side effects (Table 1). The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is a validated clinical measure of ataxia, with higher scores indicating more prominent ataxia 58. SARA scores were recorded for all patients prior to beginning treatment and were assessed during subsequent visits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean progression rate is 1.49 (±0.07 SE) per year at the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA),40 with earlier age at onset being associated with faster progression 41…”
Section: Clinical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%