1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01251024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale effects in the determination of rock mass strength and deformability

Abstract: Summary --Z u s a m m e n f a s s u n g --Rdsum~ ,Scale Effects in the Determination o[ Rock Mass Strength and Deformability.An extensive literature search was conducted, to investigate the effect of the scale of testing on the measurement of strength and stiffness of rock masses. The results are presented for bearing capacity tests, compression tests, and several types of deformability tests.Field strength values are generally several times smaller than laboratory values. Field moduli generally appear to be b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1
5

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
40
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in situ elastic properties are normally different from those measured in the laboratory. In particular, in situ static Young's moduli tend to be as much as 1.5-5 times lower than that measured of the same rock type in the laboratory (Heuze, 1980). This is mainly because fractures in in-situ rock masses lower their stiffnesses whereas the rock samples measured in the laboratory are essentially free of fractures (Goodman, 1989;Priest, 1992;Hudson and Harrison, 1997).…”
Section: Hydrofracture Emplacement In Mechanically Layered Rocks Mechmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Also, in situ elastic properties are normally different from those measured in the laboratory. In particular, in situ static Young's moduli tend to be as much as 1.5-5 times lower than that measured of the same rock type in the laboratory (Heuze, 1980). This is mainly because fractures in in-situ rock masses lower their stiffnesses whereas the rock samples measured in the laboratory are essentially free of fractures (Goodman, 1989;Priest, 1992;Hudson and Harrison, 1997).…”
Section: Hydrofracture Emplacement In Mechanically Layered Rocks Mechmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The results from the borehole jack tests show that most of the estimated in situ rock modulus values range from about 6 to 12 GPa (with extremes of 4 to 23 GPa) as shown in The estimated volume of rock mass (Heuze 1980, Table 1) involved in a NX-borehole jack test is about 0.13 m 3 (4.6 ft 3 ). Since this is not large enough to incorporate discontinuities on the drift scale, properly conducted borehole jack tests in better rock may overestimate actual rock mass modulus values.…”
Section: Borehole Jack Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adicionalmente, um conjunto de amostras de uma mesma rocha ou de um mesmo maciço rochoso quando submetida a carregamento em condições similares, apresenta características não constantes, mas dependentes da dimensão da amostra. Essa variação é denominada de efeito escala (CUNHA, 1990(CUNHA, e 1992 O efeito de escala na resistência de materiais rochosos tem sido observado em diferentes modalidades de ensaios, além da compressão uniaxial, como na compressão diametral, carga pontual, cisalhamento direto, ensaios de deformabilidade e capacidade de carga (HEUZE, 1980;BRACE, 1981;TSUR-LAVIE & DENEKAMP, 1982b;CUNHA, 1990;BANDIS, 1990). WEILBULL (1952) observou o mesmo fenômeno em outros materiais diferentes de rocha.…”
Section: Efeito Escala Em Materiais Rochososunclassified