2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale effect in USLE and WEPP application for soil erosion computation from three Sicilian basins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
68
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…A critical point in upscaling the results from rainfall simulator area to catchment area scale was the well-known scale problem [36]. The plot size used in the rainfall simulations (0.28 m 2 ) is too small for rill initiation.…”
Section: Combination Of the Results And Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical point in upscaling the results from rainfall simulator area to catchment area scale was the well-known scale problem [36]. The plot size used in the rainfall simulations (0.28 m 2 ) is too small for rill initiation.…”
Section: Combination Of the Results And Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…saturated conductivity Ks and storage suction factor Sf, Manning's roughness coefficients n, geomorphology and granulometry. This set corresponds to the devices and the model structures (Amore et al 2004;Morgan & Nearing 2011). The characteristics of soil hydrology are different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sediment yields (SY, analogous to WEPP erodibilities), as they depend on soil type, functional class and slope (similar in concept to the SDR factor of Amore et al 2004) developed from the hundreds of RS plots across the basin, are summarized in Table 4 (TMDL 2008). These regression equations relate sediment load per unit of runoff to soil type, functional condition and slope and particle-size distributions in runoff at an approximately 1-m 2 scale (RS plot).…”
Section: Methodology and Scaling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDR is considered a function of slope (Kling, in Hadley et al 1985, Kothyari et al 1994, or, using morphologic criteria, a travel-time probability-density function evaluated as a function of slope and slope length (Ferro and Minacapilli 1995). Assuming uniform flow, constant intensity rainfall and the SDR concept where travel times were taken as proportional to the ratio between the path length to the closest stream and a representative velocity (Santoro et al 2002), Amore et al (2004) found no real scale dependence of RUSLE and WEPP in predicting runoff and erosion from Sicilian sub-basins between 0.5 and 20 km 2 despite comparisons between results from sub-basins having very different areal distributions of soil, land uses, and slopes. As found in earlier studies (Nearing 1998, 2000, Nearing et al 1999, relative prediction error increased as erosion rates (sediment loads/discharges) decreased due in part to the naturally greater variation of small erosion rates.…”
Section: Forest Erosion Processes and Modelling Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%