Abstract:In the first part of this paper we review current knowledge regarding fish scales, focusing on elasmoid scales, the only type found in two model species, the zebrafish and the medaka. After reviewing the structure of scales and their evolutionary origin, we describe the formation of the squamation pattern. The regularity of this process suggests a pre-patterning of the skin before scale initiation. We then summarise the dynamics of scale development on the basis of morphological observations. In the absence of… Show more
“…Comparative studies of ontogenetic process require not only embryonic, but also postembryonic staging tables, as several important morphogenetic processes which form characteristic features of each species (for example, internal and external skeletal structures and scale patterns) are known to proceed during postembryonic stages (Arratia et al, 1990, 1991; Cubbage and Mabee, 1996; Schilling and Kimmel, 1997; Van der Heyden and Huyssune, 2000; Van der Heyden et al, 2000; Witten et al, 2001; Yelick and Schilling, 2002; Mabee et al, 2002; Bird and Mabee, 2003; Sire and Huysseune, 2003; Webb and Shirey, 2003; Elizondo et al, 2005; Sire and Akimenko, 2004; Thorsen and Hale, 2005; Patricia et al, 2007; Patterson et al, 2008; Parichy et al, 2009; Kimmel et al, 2010; Budi et al, 2011; Bensimon‐Brito et al, 2012). However, at present there is no widely available postembryonic developmental staging table for goldfish, in practice.…”
“…Comparative studies of ontogenetic process require not only embryonic, but also postembryonic staging tables, as several important morphogenetic processes which form characteristic features of each species (for example, internal and external skeletal structures and scale patterns) are known to proceed during postembryonic stages (Arratia et al, 1990, 1991; Cubbage and Mabee, 1996; Schilling and Kimmel, 1997; Van der Heyden and Huyssune, 2000; Van der Heyden et al, 2000; Witten et al, 2001; Yelick and Schilling, 2002; Mabee et al, 2002; Bird and Mabee, 2003; Sire and Huysseune, 2003; Webb and Shirey, 2003; Elizondo et al, 2005; Sire and Akimenko, 2004; Thorsen and Hale, 2005; Patricia et al, 2007; Patterson et al, 2008; Parichy et al, 2009; Kimmel et al, 2010; Budi et al, 2011; Bensimon‐Brito et al, 2012). However, at present there is no widely available postembryonic developmental staging table for goldfish, in practice.…”
“…apoeb transcripts were subsequently restricted to the posterior margin epidermis of the papilla (Monnot et al, 1999), a pattern also observed with esr2a (Fig. 4G,M) and sonic hedgehog (shh; Sire and Akimenko, 2004). Ultrastructural studies suggested that epidermal-dermal interactions continued to occur in the posterior region of the formed scale (Sire et al, 1997a).…”
Section: During the Larval-juvenile Transition And In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In zebrafish, the first scales appear on the lateral and posterior part of the fish at the midregion of the caudal fin and squamation then spread forward, downward, and laterally (Waterman, 1970;Sire et al, 1997a;Sire and Akimenko, 2004). Starting from a homogeneous rbp4 expressed epidermal cover (Fig.…”
Section: During the Larval-juvenile Transition And In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the transient down-regulation of rbp4 in epidermal cells occurs according to a restrictive mode of molecular expression and does not appear to play a role in the early specification or positioning of the placodes, but rather to be a downstream responsive early element in the inducible wave of epidermal placode formation. Morphological studies have revealed that scale formation takes place in the dermis after condensation below the epidermal basement membrane of a scale dermal papilla from invading fibroblast-like cells, by around 1 month postfertilization (Le Guellec et al, 2004;Sire and Akimenko, 2004). Each scale-forming cell population in a scale papilla gives rise to a single scale.…”
Section: During the Larval-juvenile Transition And In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This metamorphosis entails changes in a variety of organ systems, including resorption of the larval fin fold and development of adult unpaired fins, development of scales in the integument, and formation of an adult pigment pattern (Brown, 1997;Sire et al, 1997a). Numerous studies have illustrated the morphogenesis of scales in teleost fish, including zebrafish (Waterman, 1970;Sire et al, 1997a,b;Sire and Akimenko, 2004).…”
Very little is known about the molecular control of skin patterning and scale morphogenesis in teleost fish. We have found radially symmetrical epidermal placodes with down-regulation of retinol-binding protein 4 (rbp4) expression during the initial paired fin and scale morphogenesis in zebrafish (Danio rerio). This finding may be related to changes in keratinocyte cytodifferentiation and/or the integument retinoid metabolism. rbp4 transcripts are expressed afterward in the central epidermis of the scale papilla and gradually extend to the epidermis, covering the growing scale, whereas no transcripts were detected in posterior margin epidermis. In contrast, induction of apolipoprotein Eb (apoeb) and up-regulation of estrogen receptor 2a (esr2a) transcripts were observed in the epidermis at initiator sites of zebrafish ectodermal/dermal appendage morphogenesis. This expression was maintained in the posterior margin epidermis of the formed scales. esr2a was also strongly expressed in neuromasts, whereas no rbp4 and apoeb transcripts were detected in these mechanosensory structures. The observed epidermal molecular events suggest that epidermis patterning is due to an activator-inhibitor mechanism operational at epidermal-dermal interaction sites. rbp4 transcript expression was also strongly down-regulated by 1-phenyl-2-thio-urea (PTU). As this inhibitor is commonly used to block obscuring pigmentation during in situ hybridization studies, this finding suggests that PTU should be used with caution, particularly in studying skin development. Developmental Dynamics 235:3071-3079, 2006.
We integrate recent data to shed new light on the thorny controversy of how teeth arose in evolution. Essentially we show (a) how teeth can form equally from any epithelium, be it endoderm, ectoderm or a combination of the two and (b) that the gene expression programs of oral vs. pharyngeal teeth are remarkably similar. Classic theories suggest that (i) skin denticles evolved first and odontode-inductive surface ectoderm merged inside the oral cavity to form teeth (the 'outside-in' hypothesis) or that (ii) patterned odontodes evolved first from endoderm deep inside the pharyngeal cavity (the 'inside-out' hypothesis). We propose a new perspective that views odontodes as structures sharing a deep molecular homology, united by sets of co-expressed genes defining a competent thickened epithelium and a collaborative neural crest derived ectomesenchyme. Simply put, odontodes develop 'inside and out,' wherever and whenever these co-expressed gene sets signal to one another. Our perspective complements the classic theories and highlights an agenda for specific experimental manipulations in model and non-model organisms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.