2013
DOI: 10.1002/2013jf002917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale-dependent interactions between wood and channel dynamics: Modeling jam formation and sediment storage in gravel-bed streams

Abstract: .[1] A stochastic model is used to investigate how the geomorphic function of wood changes with watershed scale, assuming wood recruitment occurs due to the mortality of individual trees, not to mass recruitment events such as landslides or episodic bank erosion. The model replicates the downstream decline in total wood load observed in the field, but predicts that the functional wood load peaks in channels having bankfull widths about 33% of the characteristic riparian tree height. The model also predicts tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results contribute to a greater understanding of the longitudinal trends in wood loading and habitat availability that result from changes in channel size, as well as the effects of disturbances which interrupt these broad underlying patterns. As shown by Eaton and Hassan [2013], the total wood load in the base scenario is negatively related to channel size, characterized here by bankfull discharge. This pattern, which is supported by empirical data [e.g., Lienkaemper and Swanson, 1987;Bilby et al, 1989;Gurnell et al, 2002;Wohl and Jaeger, 2009], results from two primary factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simulation results contribute to a greater understanding of the longitudinal trends in wood loading and habitat availability that result from changes in channel size, as well as the effects of disturbances which interrupt these broad underlying patterns. As shown by Eaton and Hassan [2013], the total wood load in the base scenario is negatively related to channel size, characterized here by bankfull discharge. This pattern, which is supported by empirical data [e.g., Lienkaemper and Swanson, 1987;Bilby et al, 1989;Gurnell et al, 2002;Wohl and Jaeger, 2009], results from two primary factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The effects of wood are also limited in small streams as an increasing proportion of pieces are suspended on the channel banks [ Eaton and Hassan , ]. Functional wood load—the proportion of the total wood load located within the bankfull channel—and morphological impact are therefore greatest in intermediate‐sized streams [ Wohl and Jaeger , ; Eaton and Hassan , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More detailed models have been used at regional and catchment scales to identify the potential source areas of large wood, including different recruitment processes, and to compute potential recruitable volumes of wood and transport rates [Czarnomski et al, 2008;Marcus et al, 2011;Wohl, 2011;Eaton et al, 2012;Eaton and Hassan, 2013]. Recent approaches have employed geographic information systems [Mazzorana et al, 2009;Rigon et al, 2012;Lucía et al, 2014b] and have applied fuzzy-logic principles [Ruiz-Villanueva et al, 2014a] to quantify wood potential volume in a spatially distributed way.…”
Section: Reviews Of Geophysicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained patterns of LW deposition predicted by the model together with in situ observations will increase the understanding of LW dynamics in the Czarny Dunajec River in particular and in other mountain rivers wider than the height of riparian trees (Gurnell et al ., ; Eaton and Hassan, ; Wyżga et al ., ) in general. In addition, recognition of the factors controlling preferential sites of LW deposition is crucial for the evaluation of flood risks related to LW accumulations in mountain rivers (Kundzewicz et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%